backlinks from blog comments...use website as name?

[Testogainz]

sup guys,

question:

when commenting on blogpost in my niche for backlinks, shall i use my website as name? So the anchor of the backlink is the url? Or it doesn't matter? Just thinking that the blog owner may not want those comments on his/her site and prefer a real name with a website behind it?

 

[Frap]

Just make sure your anchors are spread out evenly. Exact match, keyword, long tail, etc....

Blog comments are usually considered spam anyways so it doesn't matter. You should think about that when you start doing web 2.0's contextual links pbn high da etc...

 

[CyberHour]

I would advise you to NOT farm backlinks with comments

 

[davids355]

I think website url is more natural for blog comments but as said above, I’d use them sparingly because they are generally considered as quite a spammy type of link - you can mitigate this by posting manually on very relevant sites with low obl.

 

[rafark]

That kind of comment has a high chance to go straight to the trash.

 

[Respenzer]

just the use the keyword you want to rank

 

[xjapan]

use brand name and url as they are less spammy, if you would like to use exact keyword, I would suggest you use contextual instead

 

[ryan olsen]

use brand name and url as they are less spammy, if you would like to use exact keyword, I would suggest you use contextual instead

both way google caught site and down rank from SERP

 

[BlackShield]

when commenting on blogpost in my niche for backlinks, shall i use my website as name? So the anchor of the backlink is the url? Or it doesn't matter? Just thinking that the blog owner may not want those comments on his/her site and prefer a real name with a website behind it?

I would not recommend the username as anchor text and link back your homepage URL. Because It looks quite spammy and it will affect your page where the link juice passed. Also, It is good to post links according to the discussions going on that is exactly or relate to your site/page topic. This looks natural, anyway.