fxmanaged
Regular Member
- May 1, 2012
- 329
- 51
Yes luxury and lifestyle related.How do you get 5 different sets of 30 hashtags ?
Are those all hashtags of the same niche ?
Yes luxury and lifestyle related.How do you get 5 different sets of 30 hashtags ?
Are those all hashtags of the same niche ?
Yes luxury and lifestyle related.
So what you're saying is that sites with original luxury content will jump when that happens? or are you saying something else?Ive been monitoring some of those tags
#watchesofinstagram #ootd
#luxurylifestyle
#watchporn #hodnikee
#dapper #sartorialist
#luxurygear
#WatchPorn #Dapper
#watchuseek
#teamwatchanish #gearpatrol
#uncrate #WatchOfTheDay
#hodinkee
#dailywatch
#Dadthreads
#horology #uhren
They all tank. Over run by bots. All dead.
Clients I am working with are waiting for HR3945 legislation to pass to enact some takedowns.
Luxury isn't a good niche to be in right now or by February.
Sites like ablogtowatch, hodnikee, robb report, gear patrol, uncrate will jump once HR 3945 passes.
So what you're saying is that sites with original luxury content will jump when that happens? or are you saying something else?
But unless you're a page that is scraping the content of other pages, I don't see how this is relevant.What I am saying, before, IP lawsuits was a costly affair and not suitable in small claims.
If new legislation passes (which it looks likely), it cost $60 to serve someone in their jurisdiction. With that in mind, if you are in Oregon and Hodnikee serves you from New York, you have to show up to New York or forfeit your defense. Or pay what they are asking up risk $15k in fines.
It will heavily slanted toward the plaintiff. Some people are seeing easy way to generate $$$. At $15k per infringement with $40-60 cost to serve, it is a no-brainer. Trump is making it easier for plaintiffs to serve IP claims in small claims court. Who would put that off the table if that form of income is available with little cost.
I can see companies that serve (court order) build up services for this.
If you take a picture of that AP Royal Oak that some Hodnikee writer had backstage pass at Basel, to post on your feed, it is a definite problem.But unless you're a page that is scraping the content of other pages, I don't see how this is relevant.
But what does that have to do with hashtags?If you take a picture of that AP Royal Oak that some Hodnikee writer had backstage pass at Basel, to post on your feed, it is a definite problem.
This happen last year as some bloggers posted exclusives of the new Tudor Black Bay chronograph at pre Basel party. A few luxe account reposted and got served. They ended up paying $3000 to avoid a lawsuit. They have gotten more as those were embargo picts posted on IG personal accounts of those writers. The large feature reposted without asking.
I am watching him from many days making these kind of comments and posts to scare the people who are operating IG accounts.But what does that have to do with hashtags?
It was a topic about hashtags and somehow it got into a FUD topic about new copyright laws.I am watching him from many days making these kind of comments and posts to scare the people who are operating IG accounts.