Multiloginapp Alternatives?

[Deleted member 657006]

this seemed to be a bludy good altenative and it free ...
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/

each tab you setup can have a private proxie
and it own cookie .

so combinding a color tab to each account
and a proxie is a awsome way to do separate account to work on ...

so if i use 100 accounts with facebook and assign them all proxies , i know can control all them 100 accounts via clicking a tab on the browser .....

just makes life so easer ....

and it free unreal

 

[BloodyNinja]

this seemed to be a bludy good altenative and it free ...
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/

each tab you setup can have a private proxie
and it own cookie .

so combinding a color tab to each account
and a proxie is a awsome way to do separate account to work on ...

so if i use 100 accounts with facebook and assign them all proxies , i know can control all them 100 accounts via clicking a tab on the browser .....

just makes life so easer ....

and it free unreal

Seemingly it only separates cookies and assigns color codes to tabs. Isn't capable of managing proxies.

 

[Deleted member 657006]

Seemingly it only separates cookies and assigns color codes to tabs. Isn't capable of managing proxies.

so that mean ill need to use a proxie changer and use the same account tabs names so they both tally ...

sound right ?

i will assign proxies and set them to the same account.

every time i use a certain account i just select correct proxie for that account ...

 

[ryanh4xor]

+1 For Ghost Browser <3

 

[KIMW]

@KIMW I just like when people share their experience before presenting a question.

I could not share my experience because yet I did not use Ghost Browser. It why I was asking how it was doing comparatively with MultiLoginApp.

 

[KIMW]

BloodyNinja is pretty helpful on these forums tho especially if you have questions regarding browser privacy.

I am sure he is. I think he just got upset when he saw people were criticizing the cost of Multiloginapp and were looking for an alternative that is more affordable.

You definitely have to use both and see which works better for you on top of considering if the costs outweigh the benefits.

That's right. But even if MultiLoginApp is better I won't spend $60/month.
I think it's a wrong strategy because if MultiLoginApp was cheaper much more people would be willing to subscribe.

 

[HoNeYBiRD]

so that mean ill need to use a proxie changer and use the same account tabs names so they both tally ...

sound right ?

i will assign proxies and set them to the same account.

every time i use a certain account i just select correct proxie for that account ...

Sounds easy, isn't it? But in fact, you won't be able to run different proxies per tab. Changing proxies when visiting different tabs isn't really feasible, you'll make a mistake sooner than later. You will need to run multiple FF instances for that. If you want to operate and keep 100 accs separated, then 100 instances. And it's still not quite the same what Multiloginapp does, because you'll be leaving the same browser fingerprint with all of the profiles. You'd need to use antifingerprinting addons: webrtc leak prevent, user agent switcher/randomizer, canvas fingerprint blocker. There are addons for all this for the major browsers.

 

[KIMW]

[...] Changing proxies when visiting different tabs isn't really feasible [...] You'd need to use antifingerprinting addons: webrtc leak prevent, user agent switcher/randomizer, canvas fingerprint blocker. There are addons for all this for the major browsers.

It seems that Ghost Browser is doing that AND just for $10/month.

 

[HoNeYBiRD]

It seems that Ghost Browser is doing that AND just for $10/month.

Yea, i was referring to FF and that particular addon redarrow posted above.

Multiloginapp is doing that too, for free if 10 browser profiles are enough. Honestly if you need more than that, that's not too convenient to manage manually anyway, so you'll just invest in a non-browser based bot - at least i would - , where you don't have to worry about browser footprints.

You can replicate most of the stuff what Multiloginapp or Ghostbrowser does, even for free. Although it's true that you need to know what you're doing, you need to work on it and the result still won't be that convenient as if you were using a paid, ready-made solution.

 

[BloodyNinja]

I am sure he is. I think he just got upset when he saw people were criticizing the cost of Multiloginapp and were looking for an alternative that is more affordable.

Dude, nobody was criticizing Multiloginapp here. Let alone getting upset... If we wanted everyone to pay more, there wouldn't be a free subscription plan in the first place. We even don't limit the number of free accounts a single user can have. If that doesn't tell you anything, I don't know what would.

That's right. But even if MultiLoginApp is better I won't spend $60/month.
I think it's a wrong strategy because if MultiLoginApp was cheaper much more people would be willing to subscribe.

I appreciate your suggestion

 

[KIMW]

Multiloginapp is doing that too, for free if 10 browser profiles are enough.

The free version of Multiloginapp is very limited. It's just good to try out the software.
I think many of us don't need more than 10 browser profiles but with the free version they are a few important restrictions. One of them is you cannot load any browser extensions, for example.

You can replicate most of the stuff what Multiloginapp or Ghostbrowser does, even for free [...] the result still won't be that convenient as if you were using a paid, ready-made solution.

I totally agree! It's why I would not mind to pay a few bucks for it every month.

 

[KIMW]

Dude, nobody was criticizing Multiloginapp here.

I did not say someone was criticizing your work on Multiloginapp!!! I said: "people were criticizing the cost of Multiloginapp". Read again the OP of this topic.

 

[ExtremeRandom]

Ghost Browser also has free tier which is pretty much the same as multilogin apps. I definitely agree that multilogin app costs too much for what you get, but it is a good program, as is ghost browser

 

[KIMW]

I definitely agree that multilogin app costs too much for what you get, but it is a good program, as is ghost browser

Yeah, actually I am quite tempted by Ghost Browser. Even if I upgrade to premium, it's only $10/month. That's $50/month cheaper than Multiloginapp.

 

[BloodyNinja]

The free version of Multiloginapp is very limited. It's just good to try out the software.
I think many of us don't need more than 10 browser profiles but with the free version they are a few important restrictions. One of them is you cannot load any browser extensions, for example.

Here's a sneak peek into our future plans. We might add browser extensions support to the free plan. Also, possibly Stealthfox will be enabled there. Just this is not our priority right now.

 

[KIMW]

Here's a sneak peek into our future plans. We might add browser extensions support to the free plan. Also, possibly Stealthfox will be enabled there. Just this is not our priority right now.

Any browser extensions and Stealthfox included would be great! Perhaps you should also reconsider your commercial strategy to offer subscription plan for about the same cost as Ghost Browser.

 

[KIMW]

invest in a non-browser based bot - at least i would - , where you don't have to worry about browser footprints.

@HoNeYBiRD
What's a non-browser based bot?? I did a quick search but couldn't find what it is.

 

[ExtremeRandom]

@HoNeYBiRD
What's a non-browser based bot?? I did a quick search but couldn't find what it is.

I think he means a script that runs on a headless browser or a script based around sending http requests which would avoid using an browser entirely

 

[KIMW]

I think he means a script that runs on a headless browser or a script based around sending http requests which would avoid using an browser entirely

Thanks.

 

[living2xl]

There is another browser you can find on the darknets which is far better and you can find a cracked version too on dnm's
I wont say the name here since it may not be allowed