google detecting tier 2 backlinks in search console - How ?

[hadron]

hi

i build a few test backlinks to a fresh new site. It was like this

gsa spam >> 301 redirects (bitly, owly ...) >> Web 2 Profile links >> MS

the site is added to search console.
suprisingly :

1. none of the web 2 profiles are indexed.
2. all the 301 redirect urls i.e. bitly, owly are all showing in search console of MS.
but none of the web 2 profile links show in search console.
how ?

is the super algo now able to detect buffer pages ...
in that case google might directly consider the gsa spam links directly on the MS. isn't it ?

 

[volund]

hi

i build a few test backlinks to a fresh new site. It was like this

gsa spam >> 301 redirects (bitly, owly ...) >> Web 2 Profile links >> MS

the site is added to search console.
suprisingly :

1. none of the web 2 profiles are indexed.
2. all the 301 redirect urls i.e. bitly, owly are all showing in search console of MS.
but none of the web 2 profile links show in search console.
how ?

is the super algo now able to detect buffer pages ...
in that case google might directly consider the gsa spam links directly on the MS. isn't it ?

It sounds like Google has not applied the 301 urls to your Web 2.0 pages yet. I would think as time goes by those 301's will turn into your Web 2.0 urls. Kind of like when you 301 a site or page, it takes Google awhile to change to the new page url. That in of itself is not something I would get too wrapped up about unless they never change.

Google has always been able to detect all the links in the "chain" from the spam links to your site as the bots flow through down the funnel. The question is how much resources can Google apply to using that info.

If your GSA links are low quality spam links then just having one tier between them and your money sites seems dangerous to me. I generally do at least two or three levels to buffer the outright low quality spam links from my money sites. Yes you lose a much higher percentage of the bot flow coming down the funnel but you make it much harder for Google to connect the spam with the resources it can apply to the task.

 

[aidenhera]

its because shortened urls got indexed in google (they point to your webs, but in google they appear as 301s)

 

[SlickSocials]

hi

i build a few test backlinks to a fresh new site. It was like this

gsa spam >> 301 redirects (bitly, owly ...) >> Web 2 Profile links >> MS

the site is added to search console.
suprisingly :

1. none of the web 2 profiles are indexed.
2. all the 301 redirect urls i.e. bitly, owly are all showing in search console of MS.
but none of the web 2 profile links show in search console.
how ?

is the super algo now able to detect buffer pages ...
in that case google might directly consider the gsa spam links directly on the MS. isn't it ?

2 links does not register have tried that in the past with LinkColider,, back in the future it was a startung point for a new webpage!! Today google doesn't count them as they used to, am still waiting for links to be indexed more then 7 months already,, still nothing .
Try ti adapt to the new changes look for different methods!! Most of them are not that relevant for this currect moment! Tier 2/3 for diversity only!

 

[hadron]

its because shortened urls got indexed in google (they point to your webs, but in google they appear as 301s)

i feel the same. the shortener url and buffer site are being treated as the same thing due to the 301
so whatever the buffer site points to, the shortner is also pointing to (according to google).

 

[hadron]

2 links does not register have tried that in the past with LinkColider,, back in the future it was a startung point for a new webpage!! Today google doesn't count them as they used to, am still waiting for links to be indexed more then 7 months already,, still nothing .
Try ti adapt to the new changes look for different methods!! Most of them are not that relevant for this currect moment! Tier 2/3 for diversity only!

your pink color is totally invisible.
yes indexing is a challenge. social signals are not having any effect so linkcollider will not help in my opinion

 

[hadron]

It sounds like Google has not applied the 301 urls to your Web 2.0 pages yet. I would think as time goes by those 301's will turn into your Web 2.0 urls. Kind of like when you 301 a site or page, it takes Google awhile to change to the new page url. That in of itself is not something I would get too wrapped up about unless they never change. ...

yes i am using pure gsa spam (comments, profile, articles). but the main reason is to get the upper tiers indexed.
the 301 was injected to reduce the spam force on the buffer site.

but if google counts the shortener as a backlink to moneysite, it seems that google may as well consider the gsa spam pointing to money site.
so like you said, looks like i need more tiers.

 

[SlickSocials]

your pink color is totally invisible.
yes indexing is a challenge. social signals are not having any effect so linkcollider will not help in my opinion

am talking about link colider 2.0 backlink creator, not the social signals, social signal does have value, especially when you rank a video
on YouTube,

 

[hadron]

am talking about link colider 2.0 backlink creator, not the social signals, social signal does have value, especially when you rank a video
on YouTube,

i haven't used linkcollider backlink generator tool. but may i ask, where does it create those backlinks ?

 

[SlickSocials]

i haven't used linkcollider backlink generator tool. but may i ask, where does it create those backlinks ?

Random domains with Da 30+ PA changes depend on the content you create a backlink about it can be an article, if its unique and well writen this backlink will have high page authority,
its seems to be pretty decent, but does not affect ranking positively nor negatively, pretty much useless,
it was great years ago, so i though giving it a try once again, but most of those indexers are dead, so linkcollider is more for the social signals part,

 

[hadron]

Random domains with Da 30+ PA changes depend on the content you create a backlink about it can be an article, if its unique and well writen this backlink will have high page authority,
its seems to be pretty decent, but does not affect ranking positively nor negatively, pretty much useless,
it was great years ago, so i though giving it a try once again, but most of those indexers are dead, so linkcollider is more for the social signals part,

backlinks on real domains should be most useful, unless they are deindexed or penalized. there are some cheap pbn gigs on fiverr which could be better than linkcollider.

 

[Peter Ngo]

Sounds like you mess something up in your setting instead. Check again if all your shorteners are set up properly in GSA.

 

[hadron]

Sounds like you mess something up in your setting instead. Check again if all your shorteners are set up properly in GSA.

gsa just points to the short urls. either bit.ly/abcd etc
why would it be wrong.

 

[Ozzyzig]

I doubt anything has went wrong here, but instead the 301s are being indexed before the web 2.0s are. Would I be right in saying that the web 2.0s weren't detected in the search console before you threw the 301s at them?

 

[hadron]

I doubt anything has went wrong here, but instead the 301s are being indexed before the web 2.0s are. Would I be right in saying that the web 2.0s weren't detected in the search console before you threw the 301s at them?

right, the web 2s were not detected and neither indexed by google. the 301s were indexed and are showing up in search console.
i wonder now, will google remove the 301s from search console after indexing the web 2s

 

[Ozzyzig]

I think that might be part of the reason. I'd always make sure the web 2.0s are indexed in Google regardless of what your further link building intentions are.
I honestly don't know if they'll remove the 301s from SC after the 2.0 is indexed.

 

[SlickSocials]

backlinks on real domains should be most useful, unless they are deindexed or penalized. there are some cheap pbn gigs on fiverr which could be better than linkcollider.

Fiverr Giggs or SEOClerks doesn't matter, the quality today is SHIT on those platforms, seen people losing their shit over those cheap gigs, if you are planing to buy, only from the Marketplace here on BHW
i trust the seo guys here blindfolded! (Link collider for diversity!)

 

[Ozzyzig]

Fiverr Giggs or SEOClerks doesn't matter, the quality today is SHIT on those platforms, seen people losing their shit over those cheap gigs, if you are planing to buy, only from the Marketplace here on BHW
i trust the seo guys here blindfolded! (Link collider for diversity!)

I'd agree on the most part, with my service excluded of course. If used properly then the 301s are a great way to boost the rankings of certain sites. I haven't launched a BST on here because there's a lot of people that want the earth and ask the most inane questions and I really can't be annoyed with how demanding some buyers can be.

 

[hadron]

Fiverr Giggs or SEOClerks doesn't matter, the quality today is SHIT on those platforms, seen people losing their shit over those cheap gigs, if you are planing to buy, only from the Marketplace here on BHW
i trust the seo guys here blindfolded! (Link collider for diversity!)

which bst do you recommend for boosting t1 web 2s.

 

[stirredupfries]

Google's ability to detect all types of links is established but 301s are tricky .