Churn and Burn

[activectd]

Hey,
I was thinking about trying churn and burn,
Churn and burn still works?
Will it work better on local Google? (not .com).


Thanks.

 

[Nargil]

Days if straightforward churn and burn are gone. You have to approach it smartly nowadays. There are surely some "secret-ish" methods to rank faster, but that would take some time and resources to pull of and learn what works and not. If you are new to SEO, just focus on long term stuff. With churn and burn, without prior experience, you will most likely just burn your money without any churning.

 

[Lightproxies]

Sadly, churn an burn no longer works. Gone were the days where you blast using articles/GSA/whatever available, and you will rank within 1-7 days, but it is no longer possible now. Most keywords I search online, I do not see churn and burn successes any longer. Now, it appears more focused on site's authority, onpage factors, as well as local search factors, etc, when ranking.

 

[aidenhera]

i like to signup to niche related board (or official niche board) and write some logical answers to threads (at least 10). Include a link to your website in signature.

At first it was just to bring some relevancy, then I started blasting them with profiles,webs and under that gsa. its basically normal blasting but difference is that instead of Tier 1 you have natural related posts on official/related website that generates a lot of trafic (as a website) and even sometimes you might get some traffic by people clicking your signature + if these threads rank in G then its even better for you

 

[djp371]

It's starts off with - you need to know what you're doing. As Google is getting smarter, usual churn and burn strategies doesn't work as it used to be. Sites burn faster than usual. It will be a waste of time especially if you are inexperienced. If you really want to try, hit search button and go ahead.

 

[natalia1985]

It all depends on your niche. If your niche is ok with churn and burn it will work. I am running 3 c&b projects and 2 of them already getting enough traffic. If splogging works when door ways , side way sites works why churn and burn don't work?

I am not sure why people pulling leg for churn and burn.

Most replies just saying without doing tests. Churn and burn is not as used to be., But anyone thought how it used to be lol? Years ago users getting fail with SEO still it's same.

Test yourself. Never ask. Ask for the specific thing...not the whole thing. If you ask entirely you will get inaccurate answers.

-Source by my own experience-

 

[Slin25]

It works with sape links.

 

[MadCowie]

It all depends on your niche. If your niche is ok with churn and burn it will work. I am running 3 c&b projects and 2 of them already getting enough traffic. If splogging works when door ways , side way sites works why churn and burn don't work?

I am not sure why people pulling leg for churn and burn.

Most replies just saying without doing tests. Churn and burn is not as used to be., But anyone thought how it used to be lol? Years ago users getting fail with SEO still it's same.

Test yourself. Never ask. Ask for the specific thing...not the whole thing. If you ask entirely you will get inaccurate answers.

-Source by my own experience-

I agreed with what you are saying. It's been proving from past- recent years

 

[SuperSonicProxy]

Gone were the days where you can fire up GSA, or Scrapebox or an article submission software, and you'd rank immediately after 24 hours - yeah, those were the good old days. Churn and burn using these tools are now long gone, and it no longer works through these tools.
It seems that Google was trying to increase the cost for the churn and burn game. If you are able to obtain links with good metrics, something like TF>20, DA/PA>30, and get a whole lot of them in 1 go, that churn and burn is still in the game though. But the cost to obtain such links is high, and you should only get from a reliable provider. Too spammy ones may have their link profile already marked by the big G.

 

[MisterF]

I use a couple of old sites I class as churn and burn to experiment on for seo purposes. Not so much to rank overnight, more to see if the stuff I am doing works, as if not the site gets burned then it's not cost me a ton of money.

 

[Ferrariman]

I don't think so.

 

[LinkBuildingServices]

This technique was all the rage in 2015 but is not working anymore.
Instead of churn&burn websites, there are more efficient ways of optimization today, e.g. content optimization, and link building.
It's much better to invest time and money into long lasting techniques like on-page SEO, diversifying backlink profile, user behavior analysis etc.

 

[MadCowie]

It works if you pick the right niche. Don't make any statements without trying it out. Everything is not for everyone.

 

[graham25s]

A good xrumer blast would see things ranking pretty high a few years ago, those were the days lol

 

[SEOMOOD]

If you have good place for links, where are only your links then Churn and burn can be sill working.