SEO Techniques that affect by upcoming Algorithms

[Monsterer]

Hi,

There are a lot of algorithms and updates frequently.

But, what are your expectation from the upcoming algorithm, SEO techniques that won't live?

For an example, I suspect SPAM BLOG COMMENTS would surely won't live by the upcoming algorithms. This is the Update I want from the upcoming algorithms

So, what are your expectations from the upcoming algorithms?

Share your suggestions.

 

[Bread]

I suspect sooner or later backlinks from unrelated niches in general won't have much effect. Seeing my competitors with PBN domains that have no relevance will soon not pass much benefit - Google just needs to understand onpage content better

 

[SmartseoIndia]

true ..all the spam link building is soon going out.

 

[Monsterer]

I suspect sooner or later backlinks from unrelated niches in general won't have much effect. Seeing my competitors with PBN domains that have no relevance will soon not pass much benefit - Google just needs to understand onpage content better

Yep, that sounds good niche relevant backlinks would be better than general niche links. But if you have High authority backlink apart from your niche. What do you do? In such case, it increases your authority.

 

[mickyfu]

Well it's going to be another kick in the dick to the SEO masters still performing 2007 SEO techniques. I can see more SEO is dead threads, BHW market place is full of shit threads. But for those of us that move with the times, I can't see it being a huge deal, maybe just a minor inconvenience.

 

[stirredwar]

Its useless worrying about what will happen in future. Build your sites around enhanced user experience and focus upon quality content. Backlinks should be secondary.

 

[Monsterer]

Its useless worrying about what will happen in future. Build your sites around enhanced user experience and focus upon quality content. Backlinks should be secondary.

LOL !! But how would you build the sites without any future predictions like these algorithm updates?

 

[bartosimpsonio]

LOL !! But how would you build the sites without any future predictions like these algorithm updates?

Well we can make some predictions by understanding that Google is a advertising company which thrives from user tracking.

So future algorithms will take more and more human signals into account and will get more localized and specialized moving towards per-user custom results based on previous interests, IMO.

 

[Monsterer]

So future algorithms will take more and more human signals into account and will get more localized and specialized moving towards per-user custom results based on previous interests, IMO.

Yeah, it will be more appreciable and awaited one to do by Google.

 

[Bread]

Well we can make some predictions by understanding that Google is a advertising company which thrives from user tracking.

So future algorithms will take more and more human signals into account and will get more localized and specialized moving towards per-user custom results based on previous interests, IMO.

In order to do this, they will need to understand on page content better, and as a side effect will need to pick out poor sites (spam backlinks, PBN's...etc) in order to improve user experience.

I'm not sure how they will be able to measure time spent on a page, unless the user presses the back button into search results - even then the page would be cached. Also these metrics can be messed with, so I'm not convinced that they will ever take bounce rate and time spent on the page into account.

 

[mickyfu]

In order to do this, they will need to understand on page content better, and as a side effect will need to pick out poor sites (spam backlinks, PBN's...etc) in order to improve user experience.

I'm not sure how they will be able to measure time spent on a page, unless the user presses the back button into search results - even then the page would be cached. Also these metrics can be messed with, so I'm not convinced that they will ever take bounce rate and time spent on the page into account.

I'm pretty sure they already take bounce rate and time spent on sites into consideration.

To reduce bounce rate and increase time spent on my sites, I iFrame free play casino games into relevant pages. Pages with free play games perform far better than pages without.

 

[Bread]

I'm pretty sure they already take bounce rate and time spent on sites into consideration.

To reduce bounce rate and increase time spent on my sites, I iFrame free play casino games into relevant pages. Pages with free play games perform far better than pages without.

I don't understand how they can measure this, unless you have GA on your site, as the search request would be cached locally

 

[mickyfu]

I don't understand how they can measure this, unless you have GA on your site, as the search request would be cached locally

I have no clue, I'm not really technically minded. Although I can say over years, my sites with less bounce rate and more time have well out performed those that have been weaker in terms of bounce and time.

 

[Bread]

I have no clue, I'm not really technically minded. Although I can say over years, my sites with less bounce rate and more time have well out performed those that have been weaker in terms of bounce and time.

I wonder whether that's because the sites with lower bounce rate had better copywriting/content/pictures...etc, and the bounce/time is an indicator of higher quality, boosting your site rather than bounce and time spent itself.

 

[mickyfu]

I wonder whether that's because the sites with lower bounce rate had better copywriting/content/pictures...etc, and the bounce/time is an indicator of higher quality, boosting your site rather than bounce and time spent itself.

Nobody gives two wank about the content written on a casino blog. The reason why I use iFramed games to keep people on my sites and coming back to them.

I could write an article about how shite roulette is and how much money you will lose. Stick some good cash bonuses in for roulette and the clowns will still follow the links. The text on casino blogs is simply there to keyword the site up.

 

[JWQQQ]

I don't understand how they can measure this, unless you have GA on your site, as the search request would be cached locally

They own Chrome, one of the biggest browser online. They also buy clickstream data from major ISPs in the states and other global markets. They can then compare the performance of your non-GA site against all those that use Adwords pixels, GTM, retargeting or Google Analytics. They don't need to know much about your site, just whether it outperforms their averages or underperforms

 

[JWQQQ]

Nobody gives two wank about the content written on a casino blog. The reason why I use iFramed games to keep people on my sites and coming back to them.

I could write an article about how shite roulette is and how much money you will lose. Stick some good cash bonuses in for roulette and the clowns will still follow the links. The text on casino blogs is simply there to keyword the site up.

This is definitely true - and frustrating when it is hard to find ways to make a basic affilaite site more 'sticky'. But if you get creative you can lead people to click through a few pages on your site while personalising your offers more with each click - and still come out on top in terms of conversion. I find free games etc are a distraction from my goal - the aff click - but it is still possible to simulate other experiences in a way that both boosts engagement and affiliate clickthrus..

 

[Bread]

Nobody gives two wank about the content written on a casino blog. The reason why I use iFramed games to keep people on my sites and coming back to them.

I could write an article about how shite roulette is and how much money you will lose. Stick some good cash bonuses in for roulette and the clowns will still follow the links. The text on casino blogs is simply there to keyword the site up.

They own Chrome, one of the biggest browser online. They also buy clickstream data from major ISPs in the states and other global markets. They can then compare the performance of your non-GA site against all those that use Adwords pixels, GTM, retargeting or Google Analytics. They don't need to know much about your site, just whether it outperforms their averages or underperforms

Ah I see, might have to steal that idea from you. That's one of the many reasons why I don't use Chrome, Chrome OS, Webmaster Tools or Gmail. Too much data

 

[JWQQQ]

Problem is, when most of the web use those tools it doesn't matter if you opt out or not - they have enough data already to make a judgement on you.
It pains me to say it.. but the best way to fake being a great site is actually to do some work and act lie one You can get a way with a lot more shadiness in backlinks etc if your money site looks and feels like somewhere you'd want to spend time.

 

[Bread]

Problem is, when most of the web use those tools it doesn't matter if you opt out or not - they have enough data already to make a judgement on you.
It pains me to say it.. but the best way to fake being a great site is actually to do some work and act lie one You can get a way with a lot more shadiness in backlinks etc if your money site looks and feels like somewhere you'd want to spend time.

Yeah for sure, but I'm not going to contribute to the problem. I track all my metrics so I can see what is and isn't performing, I woudl imagine that bounce rate and time on page is a small ranking factor compared to backlinks which is where I put in the work