I hear different things about the service all the time. People say that you dont need to get your links indexed for them to count, you only need to get them crawled and thats exactly what linklicious promises and delivers.
Ok, here is how this works. There technically isn't a difference between being crawled and being indexed. WHAT YOU SAY!?!?!?!?!
Let me explain, Google has several large databases, "Page rank, indexed, news, images, crawled, cached etc." All of these store information about the web and about the links that make it up.
Now there ARE some dead, lost in no mans land, links that are unknown to google and always will be without some kind of 3rd party assistance, e.g. forum profiles.
Linklicious, for example pings these links and others so that Google CAN find them and then crawls them fast. The second that google crawls them, it adds them to one of its databases...if its CRAWLED, google knows about it and a certain amount of weight is given to it and can boost your SERPS.
Some of these crawled links will get put in the indexed database. In either case, whether just crawled or actually indexed, both scenarios involve google adding it to its database and therefore charging those links with the power to boost your SERPS.
So when I say there isn't a difference between being crawled and indexed, I of course mean there isn't a difference because they are both links stored in googles database in a way that can boost your SERPS...true one may be more valuable than the other...but you guys need to stop viewing indexing as being the only proof google knows about your links and the only way you can increase your serps.
You can rank all day long without a single indexed link, so long as you are using crawled links...we've done plenty of case studies for emailers and even posted them on the forums.
Fact is, both indexing and crawling increase your SERPS but crawling is quicker, easier and more cost effective (Not to mention it will index naturally on its own anyway)
