Youtube allows a channel that advocates having sex with animals, I think that damages their reputation way more than some youtuber's attending frat parties.
Youtube is probably one of the most stupidly run websites, if it wasn't for Google being able to lose money for years on the platform to overtake competitors it probably wouldn't exist today. They are probably are losing out on billions a year in advertising because of their lack of desire to monetize certain content which they claim isn't their own fault.
That sure sounds like something a publisher would do. But google vehemently denies that accusation in order to not get f*ed in the ass by Johny law (See: Publisher vs Platform/public square). Hmmmmmmmm. In any case, this should certainly add to the already thick folders of the Justice department's current ongoing anti-trust investigation.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.