1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Wouldn't it be This Easy for Google to Remove the Websites of Linkspammers from Google?

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by crazyflx, Sep 10, 2010.

  1. crazyflx

    crazyflx Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    4,825
    Location:
    http://CRAZYFLX.COM
    Home Page:
    I was just thinking about what I would do if I were google to prevent linkspam...well, not prevent linkspam, but to prevent sites that would otherwise rank well BECAUSE of effective linkspamming, from appearing in the SERPs.

    I think that some critical thinking like this for hypothetical situations is just "good for business" as it can often help you foresee/anticipate what may be coming. It also helps you realize what you may be doing wrong or could be doing differently.

    Anyway, back to my point. I think it would be this easy for Google, and I'm just looking to make kind of a "think tank" type discussion on the topic to help evolve some of my current linkspamming tactics.

    So, what google could do:

    Simply inject sites into their SERPs that ONLY APPEAR when a footprint has been searched....any footprint at all (and they've got them all...).

    Have it inconspicuously show up maybe on the 3rd page of the serps and it would have a regular name just like any other website.

    So a person searches for:

    "leave a reply" -"comments are closed" "name" "email" and on the third page there is a site called "http://technologynow.com/what's-hot-right-now.htm" <- but really, there is not content on this page. Or, even better, there IS content on the page.

    It looks like a regular blog in every way shape & form...but this blog ONLY EVER APPEARS in the SERPs when a footprint is searched. So the only way this site would ever have an outbound link would be is if it were found by somebody using footprints...who are the only people that use footprints?

    That's right! Linkspammers are the only people searching footprints! We use automated software to search thousands of footprints all the time.

    And even if we were to review each and every page/forum/blog manually, it would look fine!

    They could do this for EVERYTHING. Forums, blogs, wiki's, "twitters", facebook pages, anything at all!

    These fake pages would literally ONLY EVER APPEAR if they a footprint in googles database was searched.

    So, they take the outbound links that get found on these "honeypot" pages, and check where their inbound links are coming from. It would be IMMEDIATELY recognizable that the "money site" linked to was linkspamming and WHAM! gone from the index you would go.

    Granted, the algorithm would have to have a little more complexity than that (obviously) but that's the basic idea.

    What do you think?
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2010
  2. trancecommunity

    trancecommunity Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    35
    what if i search for a footprint then spam with all my competitors links?
     
  3. scott8610

    scott8610 Junior Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Home Page:
    Then you could deindex your competitors... hence the reason people don't get deindexed for link building :)
     
  4. crazyflx

    crazyflx Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    4,825
    Location:
    http://CRAZYFLX.COM
    Home Page:
    That's where the complexities would come in.

    Site A, B & C that have multiple backlinks from multiple "honeypot" pages ALSO have an inbound link percentage of over 80% from pages that can be found using footprints and can have links placed on them by anybody.

    Site D (a victim of somebody trying to deindex their site) has an inbound link from only a couple of "honeypot" pages. When checked, it is found that only 40% of it's inbound links are from sites that can be found using footprints and can have links placed on them by anybody.

    Obviously, again, it would be more complex, but see what I'm saying?
     
  5. Fwiffo

    Fwiffo Power Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    325
    Occupation:
    Starship Captain
    Location:
    Pluto / Spathiwa
    so basically a honeypot similar to some email anti-spam systems?

    I personally think there really is no negative to any backlinks - like the last poster said, if these were ever found out, one could just spam their competitors to the sandbox.

    HOWEVER i do believe that honeypots exist that trigger a deeper reivew of a site, either through algo or manual methods.

    I personally think that google can't factor "bad backlinks to a site" into their factors but "bad backlinks to a site" can be a good reason to do an in-depth investigation of a site for anything else that may be incriminating (ie seo optimization plugins, really bad content / grammar that shows automated spinning, footprints on the site itself, etc.).
     
  6. crazyflx

    crazyflx Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    4,825
    Location:
    http://CRAZYFLX.COM
    Home Page:
    Precisely.

    Very much what I was saying/trying to get across.
     
  7. Fwiffo

    Fwiffo Power Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    325
    Occupation:
    Starship Captain
    Location:
    Pluto / Spathiwa
    maybe - what I had read from yours was that google essentially had a policy of "make a backlink from a honeypot and go to sandbox / deindex"

    what I was trying to say was a little different - essentially a policy of "make a backlink from a honeypot, then we have a reason to search your house, and if we find anything incriminating, go to sandbox / deindex"