Discussion in 'YouTube' started by Richy1, May 7, 2012.
But they're kind of ran by one of the same owners?
YTNuke just has issues delivering on time.
You just answered your own question..
Mods, please...? Another one... Remove this noob thread.... This has been discussed lots of times before. Example here:
this is probably right. noticed this several times..
Agreed, have read this so many times.
And also, just for the record, when compared against nearly all the other YT view sellers on the web VT isn't more expensive. Most of the time it is cheaper, especially when taking into account discounts.
From which part of your ass did you pull this information?
Of course I'm not using the YTNuke PayPal on my site. I discussed it with the team, and it would generate lots of tax problems, hence I changed to 2Checkout now. Why not mail Jordan and ask her? YTNuke is owned by multiple people, *********** is owned only by me.
Stupidity amazes me. And FYI, ever wondered why sometimes YTNuke is slow and *********** delivers just fine? We may have some connected systems, but *********** got it's own.
Also learn to spell 'tornado', thanks. 3 posts? Sounds like a mad reseller to me
Haha chill son. Why are you trying start beef, and be rude? This forum isn't the place for it.
SpK never makes it out like he owns all of YT Nuke, other people say that.
Why do you come here and start trolling...?? please leave troll..
Are they both real views services and ad sense friendly?
Also YTNuke says views are 600-700 views a day now, not even close, I got 50 views and like 200 views on another video today.
This has been answered several times Yes they are adsense friendly and they offer real views (Real in the eyes of youtube).
They aren't zombie computer views or anything illegal that way are they?
Just buy the views from them I will give you back the money if you get banned Ytnuke and VT are really good.
LOL another reseller thread..
I have to agree with the bare min for videos, its serious pain in the ass,
revenue would definitely increase for me if they lowered the credits
per video min. I would definitely spend more money too.
I think the reason *********** has the same credit allocation if because
hes using pretty much the same website credit code used for YTNUKE.
Meaning he duped the site, but changed the overall layout.
You can't be more wrong than this. The site is completely coded from scratch onto another base - so there's that. Also I will be lowering the minimum to around 100 views soon - BUT, this will be for max 3-4K views. I think that is fair. Note this will be ONLY *********** though, not on YTNuke. If you want, I can discuss it with the team, but we agreed on the 2500 together for the following reason:
Only reason minimum is 2500, is because if minimum was let's say 1000, the system would never be accurate enough to hit that, and rather deliver 3-4k. If I wanted to be accurate on the 1000, I'd have to deliver VERY slow views. Hope that makes sense.
And this is already better than a soap opera
both legit so why fight.. both cost money
This Site has become full of Babies and Whiners.VT is not expensive.its cheaper than most or at least I guess the industry average is 3$ per k so 2.5 is still somewhat cheaper.case closed.
Spk has said in a post before to someone " I don't care wwhether you use *********** or ytnuke either way I get the money" so clearly he's lying I feel like everyone stickin up for spk works with him or something because it's so obvious they care far too much about his image why else would they ask for a simple thread to be deleted... JJust use ytnuke way better
Wait, doesn't that mean the 100 views option would be very slow?
@Everyone else, THESE PRICES ARENT EXPENSIVE! Yall just complain about the prices because you can't profit from them.
Separate names with a comma.