Why has Google made indexing hard for webmasters ?

praetserge said:

It's not entirely true... junk copied PAA sites seem to index quite well.

My guess is that google is saving resources but I might be wrong.

Click to expand...

seomaster5 said:

Both statements are contradictory. Or do you mean that Google wants to save resources by avoiding junk sites but it has failed to do so ?

Click to expand...

praetserge said:

Kinda yeah, that's what I think... it failed miserably.

Click to expand...

seomaster5 said:

They should be adding as much results as possible to give options to users.

Click to expand...

seomaster5 said:

making it hard for webmasters to even get their articles indexed

Click to expand...

Ashk881 said:

They actually shouldn't. They already have millions of results for several keywords. Adding new sites increases their work, which in turn increases costs.



They are making it harder for webmasters to get articles on their new site indexed*

Large and existing websites have no problem with indexation. This thread was created some hours ago and it's already indexed on Google.

Pretty sure it's a proof of work basis. You need some good number of pages for Googlebot to take crawling you seriously it seems.

Click to expand...

ThaiDreamer said:

That's actually not true at all, mate.

A site I created just last week can get articles indexed within hours (fresh domain) with a GSC index request.

A site I've been running for 2,5 years struggles to get articles indexed since last August. Hence I'm using some indexing services from here.

Click to expand...

Ashk881 said:

Your old website likely got affected by a penalty.

New sites do happen to have quite a bit of variables. Ig they index some small enough sites quickly because it requires a very small budget. Not sure why some new sites get affected and don't get crawled even after requests tho..

Click to expand...