- Joined
- Mar 23, 2022
- Messages
- 3,127
- Reaction score
- 805
I see that in most seo services related sales threads, the seller has made no claims that this service will protect from Google updates. Are these sellers afraid from Google updates themselves?
of course! No one is immune to google's shennanigans. Why would these sellers guarantee what doesn't depend on them?Are these sellers afraid from Google updates themselves?
Why do you feel that Amazon and wikipedia like sites are different?of course! No one is immune to google's shennanigans. Why would these sellers guarantee what doesn't depend on them?
I actually edited them out of my reply, but you were faster than meWhy do you feel that Amazon and wikipedia like sites are different?
Amazon and Wikipedia have a billion visitors a month. Yes, they are fucking different than your average site the seo sellers here target. They are the fucking cornerstones of the internet.Why do you feel that Amazon and wikipedia like sites are different?
Wikipedia doesn't rank #1 always because google has personalisation filters these days and thinks you will like some sites more than wiki. Nothing really to do with its authority.but Wikipedia doesn't always rank #1 as they used to, which is why I edited)
They don't need no seo work these days. Back when Wikipedia and Amazon weren't household names (in the late 90s-early 2000s), Amazon did it's seo work with it's affiliate program and Wikipedia was a unique project, which generated marketing for itself.Someone must be doing seo for them though the information will never be public.
Because they can't make unrealistic claims in their BST they won't pass the moderation and approval.I see that in most seo services related sales threads, the seller has made no claims that this service will protect from Google updates. Are these sellers afraid from Google updates themselves?
it does have to do with its authority a little, but you're right about the personalizationWikipedia doesn't rank #1 always because google has personalisation filters these days and thinks you will like some sites more than wiki. Nothing really to do with its authority.
We know the basic thing Google objects. That is gaming rhe system. So if a service is focussed on genuine links, there are less chances to be affected by any update.Thing is nobody can, anybody who says they are able to is just selling something that does not exist. Unless you own or work at a very high level at Google how do you know what Google decide to change in the future updates? It is impossible to guarantee safety from impact of any updates. I have seen companies offering such guarantees or promises of safety against updates, but I always think the same if they are prepared to lie about that then I certainly would not trust them to do the job to be honest.
We know the basic thing Google objects. That is gaming rhe system. So if a service is focussed on genuine links, there are less chances to be affected by any update.
I have a feeling that every webmaster is aware when he is using blackhat methods. It just depends on type of project whether the risk is worth it or not.Technically anything you change to a website could be classed as trying to manipulate Google rankings and as such all SEO methods are breaking their terms and conditions. So you never know just what they will add to the naughty list in the next update or the one after that or in 2yrs time etc. Nobody can guarantee to not be impacted by Google updates if you do make such guarantees in my opinion you are untrustworthy.
I have a feeling that every webmaster is aware when he is using blackhat methods. It just depends on type of project whether the risk is worth it or not.
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features and essential functions on BlackHatWorld and other forums. These functions are unrelated to ads, such as internal links and images. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.