Which one is better in blogging?

wickbruh

BANNED
Joined
May 7, 2022
Messages
70
Reaction score
73
1. Starting 2 to 3 sites, upload 20 to 30 articles on each of them and let them sit for 6 months to see which one grows faster
2. Pick a one site and go hard on it.
 
If your into writing, why not do both 1 and 2. Launch 3-4 sites, work hard on the one that interest you the most, let the others sit and wait, new and ready projects when you see what they are up yo in 6-12 month.
 
1. Starting 2 to 3 sites, upload 20 to 30 articles on each of them and let them sit for 6 months to see which one grows faster
2. Pick a one site and go hard on it.

Instead of creating 60+ threads, why not take time to actually read the forum, use the search function and stop the race to 100 posts.
 
I'd rather pick one and go hard at it. I think being focused is important in making stuff successful, I use to try to do multiple stuff at once and all I got was half-ass results on everything I was doing. It was not until I chose one thing and focus I started seeing more results than everything I did combine from just one thing.
 
Actually, what works for me is option #2.

By "go hard on it" I suppose you mean to post more than 150 posts.

That's what I do.

I'd rather have a blog that is an inch wide, but miles deep instead of a blog that is the size of a Pacific Ocean but is extremely shallow.

Of course, the key here is to target the right keywords.

It's also important to put in the time to interlink posts the right way through a categorical approach.
 
Pick one site and go hard on it. Content is king bro. if your content it's good then it offers value, if it offers value with some budget you can start the magic
 
Back
Top