1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Which Is Better For Higher Rankings: Link Building Or Mass Article Submission

Discussion in 'White Hat SEO' started by jigga2004, Dec 22, 2009.

  1. jigga2004

    jigga2004 Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    7
    I know submission is a form of link building too, but I'm currently outsourcing link building, however, I could split the cost of the link building by half submissions and half link building, but what do you reckon is most effective for higher rankings?
     
  2. Abstroose

    Abstroose Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,097
    Likes Received:
    3,475
    Occupation:
    Thai Boxer
    Location:
    UK
    Home Page:
    Personally I wouldn't split it 50/50. I think it's important to vary the link building strategies IE Blog comments, forums signatures, press releases, article submissions, social bookmarking.

    I would probably split it 90/10, depending on how effective your current link building strategies are.
     
  3. multimedia

    multimedia Power Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    887
    Occupation:
    Serious BlackHatter
    Location:
    CyBeRtRoN
    Jigga,

    Both the kinds of methods are important. But, Article submission requires more patience, investment(Unique Article creation, etc) and there is a chance of majority of hte Articles being rejected in Article directories. So, i think you can Outsource Link Building to someone as that will ensure you Permanent Backlinks which is the most important factor for SEO Ranking :)