What would be a "safe" GSA blast?

anatolij1888

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
103
Reaction score
30
Hi, Guys!
Can you share your experience on how many link you should try to blast on your tier 2-3-4, so domains are not burned same day. obviously sfw links, no adult, pharm backlinks.
Is there some ammount of backlinks that can help you to index and get some link juice on top and not burn your domain at the same time, that you had noticed? ive read that 5-10k backlinks are ok to get indexed in some messages while searching forum, but no info or domains being burned. i am not speaking om 1m backlinks in 1 day.
could it be under 1k, 5k, 10k, 50k? or is it always an absolutelly random thing?
 

Ababba2

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
401
Reaction score
158
You can do how many backlinks you want on lower tiers. The more, the more chance to gain more rankings.
If you go with blasts, just remember to blast your T1 every 4 months with a big blast or else, buy a VPS and blast 24/7/365 (better choice)
 

hideath

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Jun 16, 2019
Messages
3,635
Reaction score
2,605
Website
bit.ly
maybe you should focus on the quality of these links instead of how many of them 1st,
get the ones that get you a decent index rate, the contextual that would pass a good amount of link juice compared to others,
so, as long as you maintain the minimum quality, you can go for as many as you can actually build, the more the better,
typically, you shouldn't really worry about the number for the lower tiers, it won't get you any trouble in majority of the cases
 

anatolij1888

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
103
Reaction score
30
You can do how many backlinks you want on lower tiers. The more, the more chance to gain more rankings.
If you go with blasts, just remember to blast your T1 every 4 months with a big blast or else, buy a VPS and blast 24/7/365 (better choice)
tier one will be only have manual hq link building/ social bookmarks/ guestposts etc. tier one is treated as money site.
the question is about 2+ tiers. and the logics of my question is to see where is the statistical maxium you can do to have your domains not being deindexed in bulk in a week.
maybe you should focus on the quality of these links instead of how many of them 1st,
get the ones that get you a decent index rate, the contextual that would pass a good amount of link juice compared to others,
so, as long as you maintain the minimum quality, you can go for as many as you can actually build, the more the better,
typically, you shouldn't really worry about the number for the lower tiers, it won't get you any trouble in majority of the cases
trying to do quality is by default in everything in my mnd, as stated just trying to see if there can be some statistical avarage or min-max, that someone might have noticed. So share their practical experience.

so what i am trying to find out. example:
in case A and case B you generate 100 backlinks as a start tier 2. lets say web 2.0 with rankerx.
1) you blast these with 5k backlinks eachweb 2.0 in A
2) and blast 15 k each web 2.0 in B

in A case you have 90 indexed web 2.0 and for example they stay forever( 1 year for example)
in case B you have 100 indexed web 2.0 but 60 of web 2.0 got deindexed and discreasing daily

so in case A you have 90 left
in Case B only 40 and going down

So is there any limit that might play a role?
 

bartosimpsonio

Jr. Executive VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
20,586
Reaction score
24,945
Website
www.theonion.com
There is no such thing as a safe blast.

Most you can do is keep those lists well pruned to avoid link rot. Otherwise it's always risky.
 

anatolij1888

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
103
Reaction score
30
There is no such thing as a safe blast.

Most you can do is keep those lists well pruned to avoid link rot. Otherwise it's always risky.
wouldnt third party indexing service be about same risk then? as they do use comment posting and some other link spamming.
 

kuruptseo

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2021
Messages
151
Reaction score
18
Anything you "Blast" will become toxic and slapped.

Drip everything you own. SLOWLY.

Think of a leaky tap rather than a wild hose lol

Edit: nevermind, just saw your tag for this post "Churn and burn". if that what you want, blast away sunny.
 

kuruptseo

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2021
Messages
151
Reaction score
18
A slow gradual increase in RD and backlinks for longevity.

I edited my last post but with a blast a churn and burn may even burn before it churns by staying in the sandbox forever or being obliterated before it even ranks.
 

anatolij1888

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
103
Reaction score
30
A slow gradual increase in RD and backlinks for longevity.

I edited my last post but with a blast a churn and burn may even burn before it churns by staying in the sandbox forever or being obliterated before it even ranks.
that is the point, i am trying to find out if there is any "safe ammount" at all, i am not doing gsa too much now, i did use it a few years ago to a max. Just setting campaigns now, but looking to share experience, if possible to work out on as safe as possible strategy. i do only low and medium, mostly local keywords.
 

kuruptseo

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2021
Messages
151
Reaction score
18
my experience with going heavy when having a small RD count in backlink profile already or on new sites i always get slapped.

This is my first time finally taking it slow with a 2 week old network so i havent seen it work yet but logic and experience and reading their rules , patents and other seos say to go slow and build up.

even Mueller from google said "we expect backlinks to evolve slowly over time"

i noticed a new site i was for no other reason but LAZY to build for , built 1 link per month for 2 months then stopped working on it. that one is still ranking , the others i worked hard on spamming like a MF cant even be found for their brand name, sometimes even with the .COM full domain search!
 

kuruptseo

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2021
Messages
151
Reaction score
18
G's patent from 2003 when they incepted it writes "spiky growth may be seen as spam" in multiple places.

their link schemes page points out to multiple instances of "large scale this", "excessive that"
 
Top