What proxies are better for YouTube: ipv4 or ipv6?

Ipv6 is bad for views but can do comments and others
 
I've got users running my residential proxies with YT and I only provide IPv4. I think we're a long way off IPv6 becoming mainstream.
 
Hi there,

What proxies are better for YouTube: ipv4 or ipv6?
Using IPv6 Proxy expands all your possibilities!

Some will say it's a matter of IPv4 proxy being better, however, in all my tests with my company's applications, Dedicated IPv6 Proxy is always better!

But everything is really related to the quality of IPv4 or IPv6!

Since a large part of IPv4 is flagged is with low score, or is being identified as Tor Node!

I only use IPv4, where I have no option to use IPv6!
 
IPv4 is good for views I think. We are testing a youtube viewer bot with some 4G proxies and it seems good so far
 
In the case of Youtube it is not related to being IPv6 or IPv4!
Because Youtube has native IPv6 support!
It is related to the quality of the IPs and the size of the IPv6 subre used in the Proxy service!
IPv4 is good for views I think. We are testing a youtube viewer bot with some 4G proxies and it seems good so far
 
In the case of Youtube it is not related to being IPv6 or IPv4!
Because Youtube has native IPv6 support!
It is related to the quality of the IPs and the size of the IPv6 subre used in the Proxy service!
How do you check the quality of IP?
 
How do you check the quality of IP?
There are several online platforms to pay that report the quality of an IPv4 or IPv6 subnet!

More for each use case, different aspects must be analyzed, subnet size (for random generation of IP Proxies), Static or Rotating Proxy!

Every project has special needs!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ipv4 will be better in any case, but if you have enough budget - use 4G or residential
 
Back
Top