What is better, On-Site SEO or Off-Site SEO?

You need both, but on page is more important if you got nice made page and no links to it its better than tons of backlinks to bad site . But of course go for both !
 
Onsite SEO is what you do to your website to make it easy for the search engines to find. Offsite SEO includes the things you do outside of your site, besides advertising. This helps make you easy to find by these same search engines. Doing only one of these will help your site be easier to navigate. But, you need to do both to realize your best potential.
See : https://www.95visual.com/blog/difference-between-onsite-offsite-seo
It shows you more details about what optimizations you can do onsite and offsite , and what is onsite and offsite seo .

Hope this Helps !
 
Both are important and equal to each other.

Phase-1 - On-Page SEO

Once Done

Phase-2 - Off-Page SEO
 
Actually, on-page makes more impact. A site can at least rank and get some traffic with on-page optimization alone. But with poor on-page optimization, no amount of links will rank you.

But for the best result, both are recommended to be taken care of.
 
Without proper on-page one cannot rely on offpage activities so it's a systematic and regular process i.e. first proper on-page setup then offpage stuff so it's a process everyone goes through if they want their sites to rank
 
I would say on-page because it will form the best fundament for your off-site seo later on
 
Do both together. Because a website that has good On Page SEO and does not have good Off Page SEO does not rank well in Google and a website that has good Off Page SEO and bad On Page SEO does not rank well in Google again.
 
on-page is most important because without it, no matter how much off page you do, you wont rank. but both are important
whatsup with these guys ranking for lorem ipsum then tho
 
whatsup with these guys ranking for lorem ipsum then tho
if the niche is hardly no competition you can rank with almost no seo or backlinks.. if your trying to rank for anything competitive you got to have your onpage onpoint
 
Hmm let's see. I will try full on-page seo for retinol creams in my country and see if I can gain some traffic.
1000 pages for 1000 keywords, think GSC will let me get some more with time.
It's high competition you would say. But actually pages ranking have 0 backlinks and shitty commercial content.
If I come up with a proper system, I'll be able to post 25k words of content in maybe 3 days.
Then submit this crap to some websites and see if it moves.
If it doesn't, I move on and go for other channels cause that means effort in this search engine is too high and reward is 0.

Edit: I need 250k words of content. That makes it a little bit harder, so need to figure out how to execute this first. But I think it probably won't require anything else than just the same thing rewritten 500 times.
Also making this site seem like it's a big one and full of links is an idea.

Maybe I will just repeat it 10 times on the same website and produce 2.5m words of utter crap.

Oh no, these number are overwhelming even considering it could be written by someone else.
I will try with something that isn't exactly content like articles, but words - just words about the product with massive amounts of keywords inbetween.
Maybe scraping products that are on the web, then listing their names and substances, just to make a comparison and create a crapload of content.

I see no reason why google would want to rank someone that simply lists substances of their products and not someone that is listing everything and doing comparisons.

So I'll try looking for that entity that makes you win. Certainly it's not an article cause I know as a user I don't care about this content. Only chasing benefits and wanting to hear how magnificient it will be.

I looked up stats and it seems that an average e-commerce website has anywhere between 2 - 6k words on a single page. And out of that number 150 - 300 words is unique content.
But to get that number of unique content you don't need very much.

Next thing to look into is social media and remarketing.
 
Last edited:
On-site SEO is more important imo

You can't do off-site without having your on-site correct

And you can grow a site with on-site SEO, the slow and old fashioned way,100% natural...... no budget.. but you will need tons of time to do manual placements and outreach

You 'delegate' this work to be more efficient
 
This post replies are hilarious -_-

Of course for google Off page is like 99.99% of the weight. It's where competition is and its what crawlers look for

As for on page its for visitors to convert.

Good luck getting any trafic for any worthy keyword with the best article in the world, because guess what, Google Can't Read!!
 
On-site SEO is more important imo

You can't do off-site without having your on-site correct

And you can grow a site with on-site SEO, the slow and old fashioned way,100% natural...... no budget.. but you will need tons of time to do manual placements and outreach

You 'delegate' this work to be more efficient

Yeah exactly OP get that on site seo optimal first
 
Both are as equal as important. On page is first impression of site and also Off page shows how healthy of the site is. Both are very much needed for a effective site.
 
Back
Top