Web Surfers Face Dangerous New Threat: 'Clickjacking'

BlackSeo

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
283
Reaction score
398
I found this info searching the net;

Internet and Web browser security experts are sounding the alarm about a new type of malicious attack called "clickjacking," a technique that can be used to dupe Web surfers into revealing confidential information while clicking on seemingly innocuous Web pages. Among other things, a clickjacking attack can be used to take control of a computer's Webcam and microphone without the knowledge of the user.

Clickjacking has been identified as a vulnerability for the Adobe Flash player, as well as for every major browser, including Firefox, Internet Explorer, Opera, Safari and even the newly released Google Chrome.

"It is a very serious problem," said Giorgio Maone, the author of a widely praised free Firefox extension called NoScript, which blocks potentially malicious scripts from running in the Firefox browser.

"Clickjacking is a very simple attack to build, and now that the details are out, any script kid can try it successfully," Maone warned. "There's no estimate to the number of trap sites, and it's unlikely that we will see any credible report about the number of sites using this technique, because there are literally infinite ways to implement such an attack, therefore no signature-based scanning can detect it automatically."

Unauthorized Access to Information

The growing severity of the clickjacking problem was identified by Robert Hansen, CEO of SecTheory, and Jeremiah Grossman, CTO of WhiteHat Security. The two were scheduled to speak publicly about their discovery last month at the Open Web Application Security Project NYC AppSec conference in New York, but postponed their talk in order to give Adobe and browser companies a chance to come up with a solution.

Reacting quickly to the announcement, Adobe released a security advisory Tuesday, describing the threat as "critical" and instructing users on how to turn off Flash access to cameras and microphones.

"We have just posted a Security Advisory for Flash Player," wrote David Lenoe, Adobe's security program manager, on the Adobe security blog, "in response to recently published reports of a 'clickjacking' issue in multiple Web browsers that could allow an attacker to lure a Web browser user into unknowingly clicking on a link or dialog. This potential 'clickjacking' browser issue affects Adobe Flash Player's microphone and camera access dialog." Lenoe said a patch for Flash would be ready by the end of October.

Unfortunately, as Hansen and other researchers have pointed out repeatedly, Flash clickjacking is only one of the variants of this problem. In a lengthy blog posting about the issue, Hansen said that "there are multiple variants of clickjacking. Some of it requires cross-domain access, some don't. Some overlay entire pages over a page, some use iframes to get you to click on one spot. Some require JavaScript, some don't. Some variants use CSRF to preload data in forms, some don't. Clickjacking does not cover any one of these use cases, but rather all of them."

A Structural Problem of the Web

Hansen warned that it will be challenging to come up with a comprehensive solution to prevent the clickjack threat because of the nature of the code that underlies the Internet.

Maone agreed. "This problem comes from features which are integral to the modern Web as we know it," he said, "and especially from the ability of Web pages to embed arbitrary content from different sites, or to host little applications (applets) through plug-ins like Adobe Flash, Java or Microsoft Silverlight."

Maone predicted that a general browser fix won't be developed any time soon, since the real solution lies in developing a general consensus about changing existing Web standards in the various Internet standardization groups.

Any ideas how to exploit this in a blackhat way, no stealing anything...:D

BlackSeo
 
This could be really dangerous - here is an example of the process in action -

hxxp://www.breakingp0intsystems.c0m/community/blog/clickjacking

xx's and 00's need to be changed
 
i dunno, you could use it as a backdoor pass into live cam sites? or use cam girls live video to help with e whoring?
 
Couple of simple examples could be:

Clicks to adsense ads - could you imagine if you had $10 keyword clicks in the Ghost underlay

Clicks to affilate sites - CS from Myspace - imagine what $$$ that might bring

limitedless possibilities - why trick someone into clickin when you could force them to---

I'll bet someone out there is pulling an allnighter as we speak coding something
 
tmd4183,

looks like you are very versed on this matter, happy to read more about it...
 
This guy created a free tool that allows anybody to do clickjackin and much more hxxp://www.in*guardians*com/themiddler*html.

Dmore
"The Stinking Capitalist Pig"
 
if you were going to clickjack google, then I would advise the following : heck I know I am going to loose my AdWords account because of this "

step a) you will need a highly trafficked site with history or multiple sites that have a consistent volume,
step b) you will only!!! do a 5% to 12% click rate ( no more than double the web sites historical click rate )
step c) using your ad-server as the counter, set a specific number of page loads to signal when to activate the clickjacker
step d) I would only route these people to a google search, not the ad themselves
step e) ban the clickjacker from clicking when the IP address is from a search engine ( would be rather weird if google clicked itself ) and from NY and California.
step f) buy multiple small live feeds for about a total of 2500 a month and get 250000 to 500000 page loads per day. ( @5% that's 12,500 clicks @.25 per click that's $3125.00 )
step g) ramp up and ramp down the volume from the feeds, the more feeds you get the better it is, in-fact I would spam Craigslist just to add the bullshit volume
step h) after about 2 weeks, ramp everything down to normal volume and kill the clicker
step I) you went from 100 per day all the way up to 3000, google will look at you real carefully, I would expect it not to work anyway, but if you got a decent site with traffic volume, I would think small incremental steps of click volume increases would not be noticed ( 1% or 2% ) per week until you double your click volume

Just a quick note :
you might want to rotate clicking google to clicking google, then Yahoo, then another program, could be real fun
 
Last edited:
Your correct evilrabbi, but it required a certain level of skills to be able to carry it out. Now any Joe Blow with very little skill level can use this tool with success.

Dmore
"The Stinking Capitalist Pig"
 
Code:
http://www.inguardians.com/themiddler.html

Is this how link should look like ?

If it is, its down for me
 
Yes, that's the correct link. Their server must have crashed from all the traffic. I guess there's a lot of interest in this tool.:)

Dmore
"The Stinking Capitalist Pig"
 
Uhm, i fail to see the "news" with this. It's javascript and browser errors. There are very many ways to manipulate browser behaviour with javascript. Haven't gotten in to all of them myself but i've actually used scripts that stop FF, IE's - that rebinds buttons and disables them (like the F1-F12) in webapps for extended functionality and more common shortcuts etc etc etc.
 
From what I've read so far about clickjacking it doesn't involve javascript, seems like a hidden div that follows your mouse around, then when you click on a link you're actually clicking on the div...
 
I posted an interesting video presentation in thishttp://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/blackhat-lounge/27733-clickjacking-deep-blackhat.html.
Dmore
"The Stinking Capitalist Pig"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top