1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Value difference of manual v. auto created Web 2.0s?

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by schleprock, Mar 17, 2017.

  1. schleprock

    schleprock Regular Member

    Apr 10, 2014
    Likes Received:
    I know in SEO we are making a lot of educated guesses but what do you think the SEO value difference is between a Web 2.0 created by hand with about me, and contact pages and a Web 2.0 created with automation. So no contact, about me, pages at all.

    Is it better for me to take the time (using AutoFill Magic) to make all my web 2.0s or should I do a bunch by automation so I have a bunch of different domains pointing to my site.

    I guess the question is if the time and work involved is worth it or if I should just use FCS to create accounts.

    I am trying to figure out whether hard work or just spending money for automation is better.

    Is there a tool now that will create better Web 2.0s (with contact,about me, etc. pages) or do most of them still fail to make accounts on the best platforms and not create the extra pages

    AFM creates accounts wherever I want it to but it is a lot of work. But the AFM accounts look like real accounts.
  2. asmorth

    asmorth Registered Member

    Nov 23, 2015
    Likes Received:
    AFM is work, but its good for tier 1
    and they dont just look authentic, they are real accounts..

    you are just using a tool to simplyfy the creating /managing part.
    Web 2 made with automation, but later worked on by somebody, will be as good as the real thing...(if you put in the effort)

    you can also try rankerx, quite good platform.(used it before,bit on the expensive side and requires multiple 3rd party stuff activated to work properly)
    or Ultimate Demon kind of thing, although i have never used that one.