Thanks for your review and let me respond respectfully and state facts.
The client asked to mention 1500 usernames under his tweet and use accounts with avatar as A.I women faces. That's what I did exactly here:
Out of the 1500 mentioned users, 526 views were received as you can see below.
Claim : I'm guessing the majority of the bot accounts have already been blocked by twitter for spam and any tagged people won't get notified.
This is wrong because when I check the quotes done by my accounts, I see views on them which means that the accounts are not blocked and they brought views coming from notification.
For more transparency I attach here list of usernames I used:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LUlhXbqlYG-A-lI3umyvVZ2I-qlvFO2MsKTpgbb_1D8/edit?usp=sharing
You can see the last reply of each of those accounts and see the number of views of the tweet.
Like I said. Stop using the view-counter as any sort of evidence, because clearly it's not to be taken serious and it counts each refresh as a brand new view.
I checked 5 random accounts from your list; 3 of them had zero views, 2 others didn't even post.
"kimber52598 hasn’t posted"
I'm not going to run through the list, but the result will probably be similar with all.
Again, the view counter can not count as evidence of the service working, or generating any usable results.
I can confirm that for $50, he used a bunch of bots to tag users, but I can also confirm that this had zero measurable effect, as the majority of the bots used have been blocked for notifying the people they are tagging.
Here's the in-depth result of the post traffic/engagement, of which my own testing data is included.
If you think that's worth $50, and somehow accurately represents the engagement you should get from 1500 people being tagged. Then please use the service.
Thanks.