1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Turboweb Vs FCS Networker - What's your pick ?

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO Tools' started by TayaX, Oct 18, 2015.

  1. TayaX

    TayaX Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,533
    Likes Received:
    1,976
    Occupation:
    Skype : TayaxBHW
    Location:
    France
    Home Page:
    Hey guys,

    I'm planning on buying a web 2.0 creator but I'm still unsure of which one of those 2 I should choose. So i'm asking you guys, not to give me what's great in these softwares, but rather what's missing in your point of view. They both are super cheap so I'm expecting lots of cons.

    Also interested in the quality of support they provide. Anything else worth noticing would be greatly appreciated.

    Regards.
     
  2. JamesAtlas

    JamesAtlas Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    681
    Likes Received:
    129
    Location:
    USA
    I use FCS Networker and it gets the job done. The only con I can think of off the top of my head is that when you import spun articles, they can be very large. I'm used to programs like zenno that allow me to use super massive spun articles.

    Other then that it's a great tool. I usually get about 30-50 working properties.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. gutterleech

    gutterleech Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    285
    Occupation:
    founder
    Location:
    Third World
    I've used both and I can surely vouch for FCS networker.

    - Turbo web 2.0 - You get around 30-40 websites accounts, however the success rate is mostly less than 10 submits. The interface is not intuitive.

    - FCS - Desktop account creator, but web based posting. I get around 31 successful submission for blogs, and 16-18 social bookmarks. THe desktop account creator can make the computer lag sometimes, but its fast so leave it creating account for 15-20 mins and after that its fine. They have good spinner in the system and submission process allow you to post images and videos in the article.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  4. blackpayman733

    blackpayman733 BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    1,232
    Gender:
    Male
    FCS is good than others, i was used to work with zsubmitter, they are suck, no response even more than 1 week if tool down, and they don active tool , so i switched with FCS , could get 40 web2.0 last time.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. Breni

    Breni Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2014
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    www.seobrain.biz
    Home Page:
    FCS is the best from all similar software I know, but it's not the best itself. Very buggy and "heavy", not sure why it requires such a lot resources, as it doesn't do any math operations or graphical recognition/rendering.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. TayaX

    TayaX Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,533
    Likes Received:
    1,976
    Occupation:
    Skype : TayaxBHW
    Location:
    France
    Home Page:
    Well thank you guys, I surely appreciate all the inputs. I'll go for FCS it's pretty cheap for what it does.
     
  7. Aatrox

    Aatrox Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    1,064
    FCS gets my vote. Using if for a few months now and don't regret it.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. V

    V Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,330
    Likes Received:
    2,602
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    /tmp
    Thanks for creating this thread and the replies :) I was also thinking to buy a web 2.0 creator and I was thinking to go with turboweb because of the price, but I think FCS is better for the purpose.
     
  9. Luka19

    Luka19 Power Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2014
    Messages:
    558
    Likes Received:
    141
    i'm subscribed to FCS networker, and the oscar goes to it

    definitely best tool in it's field