white_wolf
Junior Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2012
- Messages
- 117
- Reaction score
- 33
I think that most people miss out the fact that subdomains are treated separately (or independently) by Google's engine. While a subdomain may seem to be the easiest/cheapest solution to create a bunch of websites belonging to the same niche, it may not be the best one.
The best example that I can think of are Web2.0 properties, which are nothing else than a subdomain of wordpress/blogspot/etc. There are a lot of blogs which are spammed to death and which eventually get deleted, while at the same time you've got a lot of 'myblog.wordpress.com' which have authority and a high PR.
Back in the days when HubPages was strong, the network had a subdomain site structure (subdomain.hubpages.com) which did not help them at all when Google released Panda (if I'm not mistaken), deindexing a lot of hubs and lowering the site's authority. The network had to switch all their hubs to a subdirectory structure (domain.com/subdirectory) to somehow have a bit of control over their rankings. That's probably what happened to Danny's site(s) when he used such a site structure.
Regards,
white_wolf
The best example that I can think of are Web2.0 properties, which are nothing else than a subdomain of wordpress/blogspot/etc. There are a lot of blogs which are spammed to death and which eventually get deleted, while at the same time you've got a lot of 'myblog.wordpress.com' which have authority and a high PR.
Back in the days when HubPages was strong, the network had a subdomain site structure (subdomain.hubpages.com) which did not help them at all when Google released Panda (if I'm not mistaken), deindexing a lot of hubs and lowering the site's authority. The network had to switch all their hubs to a subdirectory structure (domain.com/subdirectory) to somehow have a bit of control over their rankings. That's probably what happened to Danny's site(s) when he used such a site structure.
Regards,
white_wolf