jammie
Power Member
- Feb 24, 2008
- 773
- 459
Right well, i'm bored so i was thinking about LT kw's and realised this may hold true:
(theorem 1)
The sum of the number of searches for long tail keywords is greater than, or equal to, the number of searches for the short tail keywords (in any given niche market).
Using theorem 1 (above), we can presume that there exists a group of long tail keywords that have a greater than or equal to search volume as the short tail.
This probably applies only to niches, but guess it makes it easier to see where the money is at! more searches = more traffic = more sales = more profit. Thus via the transitive property of equality, more searches = more profit.
So get grabbing as many LT KW's as you can =]
Everyone knows this anyway, but now it's presented in a different way, some people may be able to use it more effectively =]
(theorem 1)
The sum of the number of searches for long tail keywords is greater than, or equal to, the number of searches for the short tail keywords (in any given niche market).
Using theorem 1 (above), we can presume that there exists a group of long tail keywords that have a greater than or equal to search volume as the short tail.
This probably applies only to niches, but guess it makes it easier to see where the money is at! more searches = more traffic = more sales = more profit. Thus via the transitive property of equality, more searches = more profit.
So get grabbing as many LT KW's as you can =]
Everyone knows this anyway, but now it's presented in a different way, some people may be able to use it more effectively =]