Should I mix BH backlinks With WH?

mrpatel786

BANNED
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
446
Reaction score
65
1) Should I mix BH backlinks With WH?

2) Say I use WH to gather backlinks from Web 2.0, bookmrking, articles, etc, then use BH tools (like comment spamming, refferer spamming, etc), will this help rank my site better? Or should I just stick with BH?

3) Most people say to use a mix, how would I go about doing that?


Thanks.
 
only difference between WH and BH is the moral way how you get your results , for what you are looking for , WH is hard work and time consuming , BH is less work and shorter time ... things like this .... mixing them means practically to play on both '' boats '' soon you will be addictive ( like all others who try this before ) about BH and will keep the eye on WH only to '' check the market '' :)
 
well BH is more fun i guess, seeing stats going up in matter of no time is great, but wh is harder.
 
I'm sure I've read in here before, that even the big companies employ BH (and/or dirty) tricks/techniques, the only difference is that they never get caught.
 
There's the idea of using 'buffer sites' (Howie Schwartz talked about it)... use your BH to support web 2.0 sites (squidoo, hubpages etc) which then link to you. Don't do BH directly on your money site, use only WH on the money site.
 
1) Should I mix BH backlinks With WH?

2) Say I use WH to gather backlinks from Web 2.0, bookmrking, articles, etc, then use BH tools (like comment spamming, refferer spamming, etc), will this help rank my site better? Or should I just stick with BH?

3) Most people say to use a mix, how would I go about doing that?


Thanks.

ideally, the only way to gather backlinks the white hat way is to do nothing....

the theory is that people will naturally find your site and will link back to it if they find it interesting....

so technically, any link building that you do that is apart from that can be considered black hat...

jmo
 
Back
Top