1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Separate Set of Rules for People That Can Prove That They are Not Retarded.

Discussion in 'Forum Suggestions & Feedback' started by Jonny Quick, Oct 4, 2011.

  1. Jonny Quick

    Jonny Quick BANNED BANNED

    Aug 26, 2010
    Likes Received:
    Okay first I must say that I've defined, redefined, and over-defined the word "retard", and depending on context I can argue the merits of all of my other suggestion based on the above. Everything I post depends upon your concordance that at least my thoughts may have some merit, even if you are unsure, or disagree. It opens the door for everything else. If you are unwilling to do that, don't bother reading any further, as everything else is aimed at people that are open to the possibility that the idea is valid.

    We are taller today than we were 50 years ago. Technological advances have improved nutrition so that our genetics is adapting to the environment. I don't understand the Biology.

    We are better educated today than 50 years ago. Much of what they thought 50 years ago was wrong. Time travel may be possible, and there may be infinate universes. Everything everyone thinks is irrelevant, and we only prevent madness by making a choice.

    We live longer today. Medical technology, etc....

    So humanity has, in the last 50 years, redefined much of how it defines itself, as per above. We have redefined the word "intelligence". There are multiple intelligences. What they are, how they are best defined is still undetermined. The experts are in disagreement and/or a lack of concordance.

    If we are going to redefine "intelligence" based on new information, then we should also redefine the word "retard". I say this more strongly. I say we must do it; our very survival is at stake here. Ask the Chinese how important Population Control is. Is this economic upturn an accident?

    This is a fundamental core of my philosophy. I trace my tradition all the way back to Plato and his visions of a Republic.


    The core component of a Republic, as it is differentiated by a Democracy, is that it allows for the existance of multiple classes as a desired end-result. There is no evolution, by virtue of the very definition of the word. How many classes, how you divide them, who is in them and what kind of power do they have (if any) is all details after this. 2 class (rich & poor), 3 class (Governers, Entertainers and Workers), 4 class (poor, working class, upper middle class and rich), 5 class (etc,...).

    I assert the existance of the Retarded Class, and propose that those that are not retard should not be required to operate by the same rules as the retarded. The retarded are incapable of understanding complex social systems, and so they are indoctrinated in only the most basic of sustainable social behaviors. Advanced people can utilize complex and newly-created behaviors for complex reasons and the social system can still sustain itself.

    The retarded are not just a drain on resources, time, energy, etc..., the acceptance of their existance into our class creates unnecessary impediments to the accomplishment of our objectives. While I do not advocate their physical separation, I do think it is necessary to prevent them from interfering on my conceptual levels, such as discussions on the direction the community should be moving in, and the means by which we can get there. There could be more. This is just coming right off the top of my head.

    Okay, so as far as any specific proposals. I know I have at least one big one, and could probably buy into someone else's if they were to underline the issue. So anecdotal, "this happens to me" stories could be persuasive.

    1) When I make a suggestion, don't close my thread without some explanation. If you haven't got one, or cannot enunciate it, it may be because you haven't the ability. If someone smarter than me burns my books, well... I can tell myself a few things and make myself believe them if necessary, in order to get along. But if they aren't, then... Well know we are in a brute-force, authoritarian situation, and I have to go "guerilla". I'd rather do stuff out in the open.

    2) Let's all agree that the word "troll" is virtually meaningless. It's an imaginary monster that lives under a bridge and you tell false stories of it's existance to children in order to scare them away from a bad place. Intelligent people should not have to dumb-down their langage because some manipulate control freaks tell lies to the retarded in order to have power over people that are more intelligent and more honest. New ideas scare stupid people, and so do manipulative motherfuckers. We should not unite in supporting the value system of manipulative motherfuckers and their retarded useful idiots.

    BTW, something interesting on trolls I read once.


    Apparantly, there was the 1st Great Troller. It was some blue-collar worker in Great Britain made some post that had people going for 9 months. He got famous as a result.

    Hmm. So on second thought maybe I should have posted this in the Lounge. To late now. It's either post it or delete it, and I aint throwing my time away for nothing.

    "C'mon baby, Daddy needs a new pair of shoes and a chicken dinner!"

  2. download

    download Supreme Member

    May 4, 2010
    Likes Received:
    You're a troll, and damn right you should have posted this in the lounge. :)
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. TermsB

    TermsB Senior Member

    May 19, 2009
    Likes Received:
    Everything you wrote after the title is obviously null, for the simple fact that you cannot prove that you are "not a retard". Next time try to put some effort into your posts.
  4. everybodyloveskyle

    everybodyloveskyle Registered Member

    Nov 4, 2008
    Likes Received:
    Delusions of grandeur...
    We all separate people based on our personal opinions but if there was an intelligence test to decide who is defined as a 'new age retard' then isn't it obvious there'd be millions of people who would be right in the middle. It'd make more sense to segregate those that wear blinkers when looking at big issues such as yourself.
    When people are incapable of surviving by themselves then they will be labelled by their condition and it's possible the bar will raise as time goes on. You can't take people who are capable of survival, looking after themselves and communicating and call them all retards and decide their fate because then someone more intelligent than you has the right to do the same thing to you.
  5. yowies

    yowies Regular Member

    Apr 8, 2008
    Likes Received:
    How %$#@ IRONIC..:D
    You used that quote at the end of that pile of inane drosss..
    You know irony is not a metal dont you. ?????
  6. StartupBros

    StartupBros Regular Member

    May 16, 2009
    Likes Received:
    Founder of StartupBros
    Tampa, FL
    Home Page:
    what the hell is the goal of this thread
  7. Mokodoki

    Mokodoki Regular Member

    Feb 26, 2011
    Likes Received:
    Graphic Artist | Fulltime Student
  8. dowser

    dowser Power Member

    Jun 5, 2011
    Likes Received:
    I wonder who (or what) produces retards?

    It used to be that intelligence is genetic, now they figured that one can get "more intelligent" - is reading one of those things that make us more intelligent? Reading what though...?
  9. nesterdwarf

    nesterdwarf Regular Member

    May 30, 2008
    Likes Received:
    State of Misery...er, Missouri...