When I first saw the Hrefer interface, as someone who was accustomed to Scrapebox I was at first puzzled. You could have a list of "additive words" (=footprints), not just one? What was this madness? Now, I see that to truly take it to the next level with scraping, Scrapebox should at least have the option of multiple footprints in one harvest and of course to go with that mid-harvest proxy update. I understand that SF is probably very busy at the moment with Scrapeboard and everything but it's just an idea to make SB into an even bigger monster. Although Scrapebox can without doubt harvest massive amounts of URLs (if you've got large keyword lists) there is something 'industrial' about hrefer. SB has the power, is actually faster (in my opinion) but these 'industrial' features are strangely lacking. Is there any reason for it? Right now I see Scrapebox as more of a 'sniper' scraper while hrefer is more like an Uzi. There's no reason (or is there?) why it can't be both.