1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

RIAA Now Suing People For Watching Online Vids

Discussion in 'BlackHat Lounge' started by The Scarlet Pimp, Dec 5, 2012.

  1. The Scarlet Pimp

    The Scarlet Pimp Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    3,120
    Occupation:
    Chair moistener.
    Location:
    Cyberspace
    it never ends...

    Can I Get Sued For Watching Online Video?

    The music and movie moguls have done a good job of "educating" the public on the legal dangers of downloading copyrighted materials from Bittorrent networks and other file-sharing sites such as Napster, PirateBay and MegaUpload.

    Lawsuits against consumers of pirated content have persuaded many to turn to YouTube-like sites that stream illegal copies rather than allow users to download and save a copy for later use.

    But is streaming really different from downloading? The question has technical, legal, and practical aspects, and the legal consequences are still unresolved.

    Technically, "downloading" means the transfer over a network of any data from a host (such as YouTube) to a client (such as your browser). Whether the data is saved to a file or displayed on your screen doesn't matter. So streaming is downloading. But is streaming an infringement of copyright?

    Streaming Video - Copyright Infringement

    Copyright protects a rights owner's rights to make copies of a work, distribute copies, and control public performances of a work. (Copyright also includes other rights that aren't relevant to this discussion.) The person who makes a work available for streaming violates all three of these rights.

    The consumer who watches or listens to streamed works may violate the right to copy it, and may be liable for "contributory infringement" by facilitating the making of infringing copies.

    When you click a "play" button to start a stream, you initiate the making of a copy of the work which is transferred to you over the Internet. The host computer actually makes the copy and distributes it to you, but you told it to do so. That is contributing to infringement, according to rights holders' lawyers.

    What if you are merely present when someone else clicks the "play" button and you just watch or listen to the content? Then you are not guilty of any infringement. If you are in a sports bar watching what the owners put on TV, you are innocent of copyright infringement even if what is shown is a pirated work.

    Fifty Shades of Streaming and Buffering

    In lay terms, "downloading" has come to mean retrieving a file from a host and saving it to one's own hard drive. The saving part doesn't *appear* to happen during streaming, but it actually does. All or part of the streamed content is saved to a temporary file as part of the "buffering" process that makes streamed content play more smoothly. The entire file may remain available for replay until you close the browser tab in which you streamed the content.

    But there is some grey area here. Some courts have ruled that such temporary files constitute direct infringement of the copying right. However, the U. S. Copyright Office contends there is no violation when "a reproduction manifests itself so fleetingly that it cannot be copied, perceived or communicated." So legally, the question remains unsettled.

    As a practical matter, streaming is safer than downloading via a Bittorrent network. The copyright police need only join a Bittorrent "swarm" to capture all of the IP addresses of the peers who are sharing a file. It isn't that easy to catch someone in the act of streaming a file. So policing efforts have concentrated on Bittorrent downloads... until now.

    The Empire Strikes Back

    The UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship) Channel streams its mixed martial arts matches from a subscription site. These videos have been showing up on illegal streaming sites, costing the UFC money.

    In addition to suing the sites, the UFC has threatened to pursue lawsuits against users for copying and contributory infringement. The UFC will use the sites' records of members and their activities to find out who streamed what.

    And there's also the Copyright Alert System, spearheaded by the Recording Industry of America (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). Stealth agents for these powerful trade groups are patrolling peer-to-peer networks, looking for illegally shared copies of copyrighted content.

    A series of alerts and virtual wrist-slaps will result if any infringements are detected.

    For those who persist in illegal downloading activity, the user's Internet Service Provider may impose reductions of Internet speeds, block Internet access, or take other mitigation measures.
    See, "The Copyright Police Are Coming!" for more info on that.

    The RIAA is particularly litigious, and has won money judgments against numerous individuals who were found to have illegally downloaded or shared copyrighted music. In one case, a jury slapped Boston College student Joel Tenenbaum with a $675,000 fine.

    In summary, streaming illegal content is less risky than downloading it. If you feel lucky, you might get away with it. But it can still get you sued.
     
  2. silentthunder

    silentthunder Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    1,342
    Occupation:
    cpa
    Location:
    In the pink
    Hope the streamers protect their revenue and audiences by updating their encryption the moment
    they detect the piglets have found a way to find real time streamers. And joke the Fed if theys can't
    take a fuck! :p
     
  3. Roparadise

    Roparadise BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    1,417
    Someone should start a piracy legal fund to fuck over the riaa and mpaa. I think they operate at under $30 million and a large part goes to oversized salraies. There is Enough People in usa alone tk donate a lil bit to it.
     
  4. phatzilla

    phatzilla Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,366
    Likes Received:
    1,017
    That's not counting how much lobby money they spend....guarantee you it's a bit more than 30 mill.
     
  5. Roparadise

    Roparadise BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    1,417
    I think they spend like $15 million lobbying bit not sure

    Edit: they spend like $9 million a year I cant c/p link on my phone but a quick google search shows they spent about $90 million from 2000-2010.
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2012