1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Revealed: Google's manual for its unseen humans who rate the web

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by swi7ch, Nov 28, 2012.

  1. swi7ch

    swi7ch Power Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2012
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    144

    Source - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/27/google_raters_manual/
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2012
  2. ok888

    ok888 Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,363
    Likes Received:
    650
    They r alway so freakin sneaky
     
  3. ikstob

    ikstob Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    129
    Location:
    ikstob.com
    Home Page:
    This is actually not that surprising .. one of the fundamental pieces of technology that underpins all the big Web Tech companies (Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Facebook etc.) is "algorithms", more specifically "machine learning algorithms". These work-horses of computer science & statistics are marvellous things but on their own they are not perfect.

    Some of the best techniques are called "supervised machine learning algorithms" and these are reliant on having operators (hoomins) to "train" them. Take Spam for example, every time you click the [Spam] button in your email, you are training a supervised machine learning algorithm somewhere in Googles data centers. There are literally millions of users "training" their spam algorithms.

    When it comes to doing this for the web, they need someone to "train" the algorithms. My guess is that Google is using these crowd-sourced people to tag sites as Pron, Spam etc. With all this training data its very easy to assess whether a never-before seen site is spam or not based on its similarity to other sites in the "Spam" bucket.
     
  4. Getwhatchuwant

    Getwhatchuwant Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    Occupation:
    Peeping Tom
    Location:
    Florida
    When I 1st join the site more than a year ago I think, they actually had the ratings document posted here. I also once filled out a lionsbridge application and was accepted but I decided not to take the offer, I was curious to see what they rated but decided against it.
     
  5. proweb

    proweb Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    144
    I read the manual when it was "leaked" a year ago. Most of it was basic details of how to tell whether a website was valuable or not. Unfortunately, there was nothing new in it. You really think Google would give "home workers" the keys to their ranking algorithm?

    My guess is it was just a way for Google to test their algorithm's accuracy against the opinion of real people.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1