1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

RankerX Vs FCS Networker - Which one is worth the investment than the other!

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO Tools' started by Mr Cracker, Mar 2, 2016.

  1. Mr Cracker

    Mr Cracker Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    436
    Likes Received:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    I work online full time.
    Location:
    Over there.
    I need a decent web 2.0 software and would like some reviews based on RankerX Vs FCS Networker...

    Thanks
     
  2. JackFruit

    JackFruit Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    175
    Gender:
    Male
    I have tried FCS, its good. No idea about RankerX.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. Mr Cracker

    Mr Cracker Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    436
    Likes Received:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    I work online full time.
    Location:
    Over there.
    Thanks I'm finding good and bad reviews on both overall. On the FCS, what is the success rate and amount of do-follow results you're getting?
     
  4. arc323

    arc323 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2015
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    69
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Home Page:
    RankerX is really nice. I use it every day to make Web 2.0 blogs for clients. It also does Wiki, Web Profile, Forum Profile, and Bookmarking. Plus, you can add your own custom sites and even plug in your PBNs. I've never used FCS but I heard it's not really supported anymore.

    You can get a free trial of RankerX to determine if it's for you. My success rate with RankerX is extremely high however I do notice that the success rate drops slightly right before they update the software. Updates happen usually every few weeks and the support team never sleeps. Good luck!
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. asap1

    asap1 BANNED BANNED Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2013
    Messages:
    4,961
    Likes Received:
    3,179
    I've heard FCS has gone down hill the past few months. I personally haven't used it in a while but it was good when I had it.

    Ranker X is good.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. everythingred

    everythingred Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,050
    Likes Received:
    1,322
    Heard bad things about FCS recently and I'm not a fan of Ranker X's interface. I tried TurboSubmitter and its decent.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. Shaunm

    Shaunm Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,772
    Likes Received:
    864
    Home Page:
    I have used both on a daily basis, I used to be a FCS fan boy but its a waste of time these days. In my oppinion Ranker X is the way to go for web 2.0 creation currently.

    Try their free trial out and see how you find it.
     
  8. n8800

    n8800 Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    214
    I'm using rankerx as well, I've noticed alot of the backlinks i create with it seem to be nofollow. Either I'm doing something wrong or rankerx is a big heavy on the nofollow side, however i had a keyword jump from 241 to 172 in 2 days after building web 2.0's with rankerx, So it does work!
     
  9. Mr Cracker

    Mr Cracker Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    436
    Likes Received:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    I work online full time.
    Location:
    Over there.
    This is my concern because RankerX suggests they have over 7k+ links, and they say 75% of them are do-follow as well...
    Based on your response this does not seem to tally up very much though?
     
  10. n8800

    n8800 Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    214
    I'm only building web 2.0 and social links. That maybe the reason i need to look in to it!
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  11. jacker818

    jacker818 Power Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    731
    Likes Received:
    241
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Entrepreneur | SEO
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I tried it and it works pretty well. Honestly i would sign up for the free trial and give it a shot. It was a bit hard to figure out how to use the software due to the shitty tutorial videos but after a bit of tinkering with the software i got the hang of it.
     
  12. Shaunm

    Shaunm Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,772
    Likes Received:
    864
    Home Page:
    I still think RX is the best option but the do follow % does seem to be falling over time.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. The Curator

    The Curator Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    383
    I don't get why the links would be increasingly no-follow, isn't that a function of the sites and not really having a piece of software do it as opposed to manually doing it? Enlighten a seeker somebody!
     
  14. zeabiii

    zeabiii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    130
    Occupation:
    Content Writing & SEO!
    Location:
    in BHW forum
    I have used FCS Networker too. Its good!

    If you are going to try Rankerx, keep us updated too :)
     
  15. Seowarlords

    Seowarlords Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    12
    Home Page:
    I've used FCS for a little bit and what I didn't like is that it could be very slow when creating accounts sometimes. On the other hand RankerX is incredibly fast and have very high success rate. Also you have a lot more site options in RankerX.
     
  16. Aatrox

    Aatrox Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    FCS had low stick rate. I didn't like RankerX because I didn't feel like I was in the control. I use AutoFill Magic now and happy.
     
  17. codyjason

    codyjason Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    69
    Location:
    New York
    Home Page:
  18. Bahmer

    Bahmer Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2015
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    60
  19. S2Term

    S2Term Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2014
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    56
    I was using FCS but I was getting horrible fail rates, like 20%, and it took more time trying to re-submit then actually doing it by hand.

    I just downloaded TurboWeb 2.0 to try it out, and so far it's not a bad little program. It's pretty basic and there are some things I'd like added but overall it seems to work fairly well. Haven't tested it out much but take a look.

    Here's the sales thread:

    http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...-blogs-network-builder-5-days-free-trial.html
     
  20. deltaone

    deltaone Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2016
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    78
    I think a certain percentage of non-follow is good for the link diversity. However, it would be good to see which links will be non-follow and to use them as brand links and naked URL links not to waste do-follow links for non-anchor links.