Hey so i'm running a registered version of tube increaser, but for some reason it doesn't work at all. Like anytime i enter in a number of hits to add to perspective videos, it starts working like it should be but i'll come back like 2 hours later and the views completed will still be at 0, and i don't know why this is. Could this be a conflict with my norton blocking it or something? Just wondering if anyone could help me out with this or speculate to what this could be? thnx
Problem with tube increaser
- Thread starter brae
- Start date
yes i downloaded the latest version of .net framework and yes i am using proxies, its weird because like as i said before i'll press start and come back two hours later or so and the views completed still says 0. I am using their daily proxy list that they provide each day, if that helps any.
yea im aware it takes up to 24 hrs to register them but in the tube increaser window shouldn't the views completed section read sumthing other than 0 the whole time, becuase for me it always stays at zero and i have no idea y, so im just wondering if theres anything else im doing wrong.
megaplex
Regular Member
- Oct 19, 2008
- 404
- 81
Can i ask a related question here?
I hope this is not hyjacking the thread but there are some experience people here.
What do you guys do about the monster amounts of bandwidth that tube increaser churns through. Here in Australia we have very restricted supply of BW speed and BW cap.
I was on a 60 gig cap and churned through 75 gigs in 10 days running increaser.
The amount of views gained were about 1000 per gig.
Does anyone use remote servers to run this software?
I like the idea of increaser but i have to say its performance did not match the sales pitch.
I found the guys who run the program are very professional and good to deal with.
but their program underperformed for me. I would use it again if i could address the bandwidth issues.
M
I hope this is not hyjacking the thread but there are some experience people here.
What do you guys do about the monster amounts of bandwidth that tube increaser churns through. Here in Australia we have very restricted supply of BW speed and BW cap.
I was on a 60 gig cap and churned through 75 gigs in 10 days running increaser.
The amount of views gained were about 1000 per gig.
Does anyone use remote servers to run this software?
I like the idea of increaser but i have to say its performance did not match the sales pitch.
I found the guys who run the program are very professional and good to deal with.
but their program underperformed for me. I would use it again if i could address the bandwidth issues.
M