1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Payback time? F.T.C hires an outside litigator in google case - nytimes.com

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by skr1p7k1d13, Apr 28, 2012.

  1. skr1p7k1d13

    skr1p7k1d13 BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    U.S. Escalates Google Case by Hiring Noted Outside Lawyer

    By DAVID STREITFELD and EDWARD WYATT
    Published: April 26, 2012


    Federal regulators escalated their antitrust investigation of Google on Thursday by hiring a prominent litigator, sending a strong signal that they are prepared to take the Internet giant to court.

    The Federal Trade Commission is examining Google?s immensely powerful and lucrative search technology, which directs users to hundreds of millions of online and offline destinations every day. The case has the potential to be the biggest showdown between regulators and Silicon Valley since the government took on Microsoft 14 years ago.
    Then as now, the core question is whether power was abused. The agency?s inquiry has focused on whether Google has manipulated its search results, making it less likely that competing companies or products appear at the top of a results page.
    A spokeswoman for Google, which is based in Mountain View, Calif., declined to comment.
    Federal Trade Commission officials cautioned that no decision had been made about whether to bring a formal case against Google. But the hiring of Beth A. Wilkinson, a former Justice Department prosecutor who played a lead role in the conviction of the Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, immediately catapulted the investigation to another level. The agency has hired outside litigators only twice in the last decade.
    ?It?s a watershed moment when you hire someone like this,? said David Wales, a former Fed-eral Trade Commission official now in private practice with Jones Day. ?This shows Google that if it doesn?t give you the remedy you want, you?re going to litigate.?
    Several antitrust experts compared the hiring of Ms. Wilkinson ? who has brought about 40 major cases in government and private practice and won them all ? to the government?s hiring of David A. Boies to represent it against Microsoft.
    ?It increases the likelihood that there will be a case,? said Douglas Broder, a law partner at K&L Gates in New York and the author of several textbooks and articles on antitrust law.
    The Microsoft case in the late 1990s transformed the tech industry, reining in its most powerful company and allowing for the rise of new companies like Google. Now Google wields the same sort of power that Microsoft once did, and is under the same sort of scrutiny.
    It has been involved in one privacy controversy after another over the last year. Indeed, the announcement of the hiring of Ms. Wilkinson ? made by the Federal Trade Commission?s chairman, Jon Leibowitz, at a meeting in San Francisco with reporters ? eclipsed Google?s formal response earlier Thursday to a fine by the Federal Communications Commission for obstructing a separate investigation.
    ?In an important case, you want to do a thorough investigation,? Mr. Leibowitz said, calling Ms. Wilkinson ?a world-class litigator.?
    Ms. Wilkinson is a partner at the law firm of Paul, Weiss in Washington. She previously worked at Latham & Watkins, where she was co-chairwoman of the white-collar crime practice group. Her work at the F.T.C., which will be part-time, begins on Monday.

    ?Technology is transforming our society,? Ms. Wilkinson said in an interview. ?It affects people at every level. As a mother, I see it with my kids. As a professional, I see it affecting our work. And in society, it impacts privacy, competition, our interactions with other people ? just about everything.?

    She added: ?Working on the investigation will be a great challenge. I don?t underestimate Google.?
    No one else was underestimating it Thursday either.
    Mr. Broder said antitrust cases charging the abuse of a monopoly are difficult to prove.
    ?There is a lot of very complex economics involved,? he said. ?It can be done. But Google will undoubtedly bring to bear tremendous resources itself.?
    Any decision about filing a suit is likely to be months away.





    i just copy this. see the article here.

    www dot nytimes dot com/2012/04/27/technology/google-antitrust-inquiry-advances.html?_r=4&pagewanted=1&hp
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2012
  2. krzysiekz

    krzysiekz Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    953
    Likes Received:
    578
    Good news.
     
  3. GreenGoblin

    GreenGoblin BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,493
    Likes Received:
    2,564
    Going to court with google is like going to court with Mike Tyson back in his Prime ask Viacom
     
  4. Alexx11

    Alexx11 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    9
    yeah but they have to deal with a "world-class" litigator... let´s see how it goes. Now big G knows what it is like to be on the spot light.
     
  5. GreenGoblin

    GreenGoblin BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,493
    Likes Received:
    2,564
    It's gonna come down to who has the most power, google who Viacom is, trust me they have enough money for "world class litigators" however google has more Power (political influence) when u have political influence it doesn't matter who you are. I mean don't get me wrong i would love to see Big G get taken threw the ringer but reality remains they have enough political ties where it won't happen, Not on there watch and nobody else.
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2012