Pattern of many websites nowhere to be found on serps, someone seeing the same?

vcjohnny

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2010
Messages
285
Reaction score
38
Already 2 days i am tracking some of my sites and they are nowhere to be found on the serps, they are purely white hat, and i used totally different backlinking strategies on each and one of them, also some don't even have backlinks, but they were ranking before
im not penalized as my site is still on Google when i look for mysite.com

someone is seeing the same pattern?
 
All I see is wikipedia, amazon and three big websites for my niche (quite big). I have seen 6 results from the same website in the top 20 for a keyword with 6000 searches.

I am working on one website at this moment and what is happening is ridiculous. I am creating 10 posts per day(unique ofc) and I get no visits for posts that are optimized for super extra long tail (they have traffic ofc but I am just not ranking for anything).

I am trying hard to rank for a keyword that would take like 1-2 months a year ago but the first position is taken by a 5 pages MNS website with scrapebox links...while my website has 150 pages and is growing by like 5-6% everyday. The worse thing is that I thought that I should try to be whitehat for this one but it was not a wise decision. 150 pages and 10 visits per day.

2 other websites that I have have been disappear completely and I have deleted some other websites. I will start a new hobby soon.
 
Seeing some similar results for quite a few keywords
 
you have to read some top sites like seomoz,webpronews etc to know what strategies really work? i am doing the same not following my own strategy
 
you have to read some top sites like seomoz,webpronews etc to know what strategies really work? i am doing the same not following my own strategy

If you do exactly the opposite of what seomoz and webpronews tells you to do, you'll probably be fine.
 
If you do exactly the opposite of what seomoz and webpronews tells you to do, you'll probably be fine.
Why is that?
I am guessing you have some authority on this seeing as you are a "supreme member".. and were all looking for more knowledge on SEO.
 
Why is that?
I am guessing you have some authority on this seeing as you are a "supreme member".. and were all looking for more knowledge on SEO.

If you want to know why I say that, check out who is ranking in the biggest/best niches as far as SEOers go (low capital, massive profitability etc) and see what they're doing.
Hint: it's exactly the opposite of what SEOmoz says to do.

Just take paid links for example, they are the bread and butter of the SEO world even now.
 
No, their magic tricks are now largely seen by serps as blackhat.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
 
have all of you above who have done whitehat but lost rankings got good variation in anchors and any of you got footer/ blogroll type links pointing back? These factors are amongst many reasons making a difference. Having said that, i have similarly noticed total crap results showing high too.
 
Do a search in Google for "english person" without the quotes and look for the wikipedia link towards the top of the page.

Houston, we may have a problem in the Googleplex. :D
 
hahaha it links to the cunt page of wikipedia :)

Although it is on #2 spot after an article about it... Google bombs are still out there!
 
Back
Top