1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Only a coward hunts for "sport"

Discussion in 'BlackHat Lounge' started by SeanAustin, Jul 3, 2014.

  1. SeanAustin

    SeanAustin Power Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    740
    Likes Received:
    708
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    • Thanks Thanks x 8
  2. lietuvis002

    lietuvis002 BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    2,415
    Likes Received:
    2,576
    this bitch should be skinned alive and hung by the neck for all poachers to see
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 4
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2014
  3. JoeMongan

    JoeMongan Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,712
    Likes Received:
    3,554
    Location:
    International Waters
    Hunting for sport and killing endangered animals for the hell of it is two different things. At least in the USA
    we have animals that would overpopulate and become disease ridden if it was not for scheduled hunting seasons.

    However that is like deer and turkeys. Killing Elephants and Lions is bullshit.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  4. NagacomesforU

    NagacomesforU Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2013
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    67
    These days I don't really get angry anymore, but man this makes me pretty angry. It is not just because of the fact that she hunts endangered animals, it is just the fact that she hunts as a whole. I understand that sometimes foreign animals overpopulate a certain area causing another species to be endangered (That is when hunting gets somewhat necessary). But this? No, just no. With such people I hope that the hunter will get to be the hunted.

    What a damn bitch: "I will continue to hunt and spread the blablabla".
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. GentlemanX

    GentlemanX Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2014
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    52
    Occupation:
    University Student
    Location:
    Canada
    If you want to hunt a turkey for food then go for it but endangered species are different as they are not in abundance. That's how I feel.
     
  6. JoeMongan

    JoeMongan Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,712
    Likes Received:
    3,554
    Location:
    International Waters
    Like I said mate it's completely different things. Don't get me wrong what she is doing is a gross act.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2014
  7. SeanAustin

    SeanAustin Power Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    740
    Likes Received:
    708
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    I see your point, but I would never call a hunter who utilizes every part of the animal a coward. I see nothing wrong with that. It's part of life. However, a hunter who kills an animal with a gun from a distance and then stands next to the animal to take a picture and feel pride... well now that is a f#$king coward.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 4
  8. JoeMongan

    JoeMongan Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,712
    Likes Received:
    3,554
    Location:
    International Waters
    We agree on the topic and one thing can lead to another good deed. I live in a state where every season
    fathers, sons, and hunting buddies load up the cooler with beer and go out on the hunt. At least most of
    them I know donate the meat to the poor. Plenty of organizations that accept it and give it away.

    Even vanity, greed, and an overzealous ego can turn into something good. :)

    -RK

    Edit: On a side note I think people are so freaking stupid to post their illegal activities on Facebook :D
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  9. SkyrocketSEO

    SkyrocketSEO Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Messages:
    4,345
    Likes Received:
    11,253
    Occupation:
    travəlɪŋ
    Location:
    Aibres
    Home Page:
    Calm down kids. Those African countries sell hunting licences to tourists and if you want to be angry with someone you can send a letter to S.A. government or whatever...
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 9
  10. NagacomesforU

    NagacomesforU Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2013
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    67
    Oooooh so it is okay then? Just because something is possible/legal it is okay to do it? Even morally?

    Well that is awesome!..
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  11. JoeMongan

    JoeMongan Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,712
    Likes Received:
    3,554
    Location:
    International Waters
    Self accountability from individuals should trump the law but you are not going to find that many
    people who have that ability. I agree with you just because something is legal does not mean it
    is necessarily right.
     
  12. RightInTwo

    RightInTwo Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    381
    Home Page:
    I'd let her hunt me any day! :08:
     
  13. oscilay

    oscilay Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    386
    I thought women can't shoot...

     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
    Last edited by a moderator: May 18, 2016
  14. TJnoodles

    TJnoodles Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2013
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    38
    I have respect for real hunters, who go out in the wild, face the elements and come back with dinner.

    She sucks! I hope someone hunts her down like an animal.

    I'm really pissed off at scumbags like Henry Winkler (blow me fonzie) who think catch and releasing trout is humane. Someone should stick a hook in his face.
     
  15. mootonandy

    mootonandy Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    236
    I can totally understand killing them for a cull or even hunting for food but killing majestic wildlife like that just for "fun" is extremely sick.
     
  16. Techxan

    Techxan Elite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,093
    Likes Received:
    3,585
    Occupation:
    Local SEOist
    Location:
    TEXAS (you have to yell, its the law.)
    Animal populations have to be kept in check for some semblance of balance to be maintained. When big game populations have to be thinned, someone has to take the animals. Many times a particular individual has been identified by conservationists, maybe a rouge elephant hurting local people or other elephants, a big cat killing cattle, or an ill animal that needs to be put down to control disease. Many times it is simply population control because the predators are gone, and the population is not thinning.

    Rather than simply killing the animal and allowing it to rot, governments have allowed people who want to hunt these animals to pay (handsomely) for the privilege.

    This brings some very necessary money to these programs, which contributes to the funding of the conversation of the species.

    Failure to do this can result if over grazing, or destruction of feeder species which can have a catastrophic effect on any species of animal.

    Consider deer hunting in the US. The deer population is at an all time high due to game management effort, but the predators of this species has all but disappeared. Without the "continuous slaughter" (so bemoaned by those who think they have the right to dictate to everyone based on their feelings) the deer population would strip out all the feed in a few years, then die by the millions.

    If you know anything about game management, or even livestock husbandry, you know there is a finite amount of land required to feed any animal. You can't free range a cow on a 1/4 acre plot, he will eat all the food and die. It takes more land than that to support a cow. Now you can certainly put 20 cows in that 1/4 acre, but they will all die a slow, painful, lingering death.

    Also in some cases, the very success of conversation efforts results in problems.

    Take Zimbawie for instance:

    Code:
     http://wwf.panda.org/?206517/zimbabwe-weighs-cost-of-too-many-elephants
    Their elephant recovery went great, now that have so many that they are having to spend money everyday to keep them alive. Rwanda has the same problem, but you know what, international pressure prevents them from controlling the population, no one wants to import any more elephants, and no one wants to help feed them.

    They cant sell the hides, meat, nor ivory on the world market, so when these animals are killed it is a waste. But the libs feel good about the worldwide ban. Meanwhile Rwanda has an elephant problem like the Aussies have a kangaroo problem. There are too damn many of them.

    No Aussie in their right mind is trying to increase Kangaroo populations. But Zimbabwee and Rwanda are being forced to do exactly that with elephants by the liberals of the world so they can feel like they did something wonderful and have the warm and fuzzies when they sit around their table sipping wine.

    Where are all you bleeding heart liberals who wanted to save the elephant now? Why aren't you dragging out your checkbooks and donating to "save" the very animals you helped the world "save"?

    Why, because liberals almost NEVER donate to charity, they click "like" and "share" and go to be feeling good about themselves. Mostly that is the evil conservatives who actually donate to charities around the world.

    Likes and shares never saved or fed anything. Write a fucking check for heavens sake.

    The money she paid to bag those animals has done more to preserve these animals and their habitat than all the likes and shares ever given on Facebook.

    You wide eyed liberal idiots never think about the consequences of your actions, only what makes you feel good. It makes you feel good to sit round and say "hunting is evil", then you go wolf down a burger or push pizza in your face.

    Here is a news flash for you, someone killed that cow, pig, dog, horse, lamb, goat, or whatever you are eating, and if you whine when people hunt, and still eat animals or wear leather you are the ultimate hypocrite. At least hunters don't hire out the dirty work.

    Try to at least educate yourself a LITTLE before you go out and prove to everyone you are an idiot.

    Wasn't that long ago when a man couldn't hunt to provide for his family wasn't a man at all.

    A classic case of exactly what I just said. Fish do not feel pain when hooked. They do not have human lips and nerves and brains. Letting them go instead of eating them is not humane to you, I guess.

    Code:
    
    http://www.weather.com/news/fish-feelings-20130114
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2014
  17. SeanAustin

    SeanAustin Power Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    740
    Likes Received:
    708
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    Nice assumption!

    Even better assumption!

    Best assumption I've ever heard! Did god tell you this in a dream?

    You sounded silly the second you brought politics into this. Sounds like someone is listening to a little to much Rush Limbaugh. Is this how you want to represent Texas conservatives? By insulting people with opposed views?

    Killing things from a distance with a gun or bow for the sake of killing = cowardice. If your going to hunt a lion for the sake of taking down a lion, at least make it a fair fist fight.

    Killing things from a distance with a gun or bow for the sake of surviving = hunting

    There is a big difference here, one that in no way needs to involve politics. Human ethics and morality would be more appropriate.
     
  18. TJnoodles

    TJnoodles Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2013
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    38
    Current research has led scientists to believe fish are capable of much more than we previously believed.

    Eating them is natural, as long as you manage the species.
    Everything feels pain when it's flesh is pierced, it's arrogant and stupid to think otherwise.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  19. KT1990

    KT1990 BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2014
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    67
    A big FUCK YOU to all you pieces of shit that have a problem with this and issuing death threats to this girl. I hunt. Come from a long line of hunters. My grandfather "British and Raised in South Africa" was also a big hunter. Hunting does more for wild life than anything else.

    First off 87% of all African wildlife is on PRIVATELY OWNED LAND! The minor percentage is mostly prservations.
    Secondly of those privately owned lands,most of that is Hunting Game Reserves.
    Now hunters pay upwards of 10k for a lion, and at least 50k for an elephant. Each only legal in the areas they are overpopulated. By the way you cannot relocate elephants to under populated areas as other elephants would kill them for intruding.
    All money made from hunters goes to helping preserve wildlife and building the population.
    ALL THE MEAT GOES TO THE LOCAL TRIBE. ALL OF IT! STANDARD AFRICAN HUNTING LAW. JOBS FOR THE LOCAL TRIBES AS SKINNERS AND TRACKERS WHO WOULD BE UNEMPLOYED AND DYING OF AIDS.

    If hunting was no longer legal all animals would be wiped out. Private land would change from hunting reserves to farms and all animals killed for destroying and eating crops. (Farmers in Africa have the legal right to kill any animal it sees as a threat to their crops and lively hood).

    The only reason animals in Africa still exists is because we pay so much to hunt them. These animals may seem exotic to foreigners but to native Africans they are pests that should be wiped out. Including the Lions, Elephants, Hyena, Jaguar, Cheetah, etc. The only reason there is not a killing spree by private landowners and farmers to kill them all is because they can make money.

    African tribes eat Lion, Elephant, Jaguar, etc. They eat it all. May seem exotic and foreign to you, but this is their local food source. Just as local as Mcdonalds for you.

    In 1900 there were a total of 50 White Rhino in the entire world. Now (because of hunters spending money, and using that money to put into wildlife conservation) there are over 20,000+ White Rhino. All because of hunters.

    You look at endangered and you are thinking in total numbers. You are wrong. Certain areas and way overpopulated with lions and elephants etc and other areas are lower. You can't move overpopulated animals into a lower populated area, the other groups will kill them. All animals are fighting for the same resources, resources that in some overpopulated areas are way less than they need and the only way to correct that is to hunt the older animals, and give rise to the younger ones.

    Do Research Before You Bitch. Also I have a Bachelors degree in Wildlife Biology. Before I became an IM and got my Bachelors in Social Media I wanted to be a Game Warden.

    You extreme liberals have fun getting your wildlife education from watching Bambi on the Disney Channel.

    Some informative info from actual scientists and biologists from Africa.....and Australia on how hunting helps animals in the long run. Hopefully it can hold a liberals short attention span for the whole hour. Maybe they will learn something.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYN0H9m5pz8&feature=youtu.be&t=7m
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2014
  20. KT1990

    KT1990 BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2014
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    67
    It's only ''Majestic'' to you. To natives of Africa they are pests. To Africans visiting the USA the Whitetail deer is ''Majestic'' but to natives of our country they are extremely overpopulated. What if you hear an African say, Don't kill the overpopulated deer, it's majestic and you're evil!!

    Lol Liberals. Love to Laugh at them, Hate having to teach them.