1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

My Web 2.0 Experiment - Will update

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by AquaClean, Oct 17, 2010.

Tags:
  1. AquaClean

    AquaClean Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    401
    Okay, I have been doing a lot of web 2.0 link building, and so on, but have never really logged it, I know what has been working, but i haven't been able to show anyone else, becasue they were not their during the whole process.

    Step 1 :

    Build 6 Web 2.0 Sites & 2 Article Sites that link to my "money site"


    Step 2:

    Build 8 web 2.0 sites that each point to one of my first step sites and Money Site.

    Step 3:

    Blast Step 1 site's and Step 2 sites, with SB, with over 15k links every month,

    Step 4:

    Blast Step 1 and step 2 sites with xrumer at 5k each site per month

    Step 5 :

    manually post to 200-500 PR4 + Blogs with my "money site" Link

    Step 6:

    Continue to watch progress and see what happens.

    I will be using 100% unique content on every web 2.0 site, as well as the article sites,

    My current ranking with this site, is already good for the few terms I was targeting, but now im going to try and seal the deal, and rank for 3 more highly searched terms.

    I cant post links, But i drew a diagram, if someone can please embed it, I will P:M you the code.

    thank you

    Aqua
     
  2. pasdoy

    pasdoy Power Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    727
    Likes Received:
    231
    Here is the image!
    [​IMG]
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2010
  3. AquaClean

    AquaClean Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    401
    Thank you bud, Sorry for the really sloppy drawing, but it gets the job done
     
  4. Micallef

    Micallef Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,345
    Likes Received:
    1,221
    Occupation:
    SE Manipulator
    Location:
    London, UK
    Home Page:
    The system in the image creates repeated easy-to-spot patterns which are improbable in any more than 1 or 2 instances in the link neighborhood of the money site.

    Pages A and B are the article / web 2.0 sites, M is the money page.

    Page A links to page B - ok

    Page B links to page M - ok

    Page A links to page M - mistake


    It's not likely that this pattern would be repeated naturally.

    My advice - don't interlink page A and B. Make a larger, much sparser web of interlinking instead. Remember, spread this over time.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. AquaClean

    AquaClean Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    401
    Hm, I have always linked page A to my money site as well, I haven't tried it with only the B pages linking, to the site, and A only linking to B

    Do you think this would yield better results?

    A
     
  6. bfellow

    bfellow Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    372
    Occupation:
    Self-Employed. No other title really fits.
    Location:
    Dark Side of the Moon
    Home Page:
    IMO I like to build more of a pyramid type structure. Using your short hand, B->A->M. There is never a loop, or a way to associate two pages to one. I build up Web 2.0 sites that point to my money site, then I bake the Web 2.0 sites with Xrumer. Sometimes I will build a layer of Web 2.0 sites linking to a single Web 2.0 site, then blast that layer with Xrumer. Point being everything has a starting point and a destination. No loops. If one page goes down, it only effects that channel of links, and not the others.

    All that being said, I am looking forward to your updates and to see what works for you. Thanks for sharing!
     
  7. Scripteen

    Scripteen Elite Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    1,918
    Home Page:
    Why is everyone becoming an architect with all the drawings these days? Isn't it just good enough to make web 2.0 sites linking to money site and scrape/xrumer the hell of the web 2.0 pages so by time you get pr4 and above backlinks from them and boost your rankings?

    No offense to op, but all threads these days have tons of diagrams making it too complicated to build backlinks.
     
  8. bfellow

    bfellow Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    372
    Occupation:
    Self-Employed. No other title really fits.
    Location:
    Dark Side of the Moon
    Home Page:
    I don't think their is anything wrong with diagramming something out to have a better understanding of what is going on. Most of this is theoretical stuff anyways.
     
  9. AquaClean

    AquaClean Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    401

    To be honest, the diagram, was just to provide a visual for anyone who wanted to see how I was planning on doing this, I dont need it, as I just bookmark the sites im working with, and once set up properly, all i need is the url to blast them,

    Lol my "architect" skill are very limited compared to most, And as stated after you, everything is just theoretical, trial and error, trial and error.

    My motto is "dont over think the think, Over do the do"

    we all on this board, tend to over think everything, when really if we spent more time doing and less time analyzing we would accomplish more. The only way to know for sure if something works, is to try it yourself.

    A
     
  10. simpleonlinetest

    simpleonlinetest Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    25
    Not trying to hi-jack your post or anything but I am also conducting a linkwheel experiement and just wanted to see what everyone thinks of this method?

    [​IMG]
     
  11. AquaClean

    AquaClean Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    401
    that looks good, I dont understand the whole rondomized properties as said here, but that looks very thought out, I kept mine simple, so I could better manage it, and not spend 5 days building properties.

    Update:

    I have build 16 properties, all with unique and thought of content, my current rankings for the key term im trying to rank for is 46 middle of the 5th page, I will be blasting the web 2.0 sites with a few thousand links per week, rss feed them, and ping them

    well see what happens
     
  12. Micallef

    Micallef Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,345
    Likes Received:
    1,221
    Occupation:
    SE Manipulator
    Location:
    London, UK
    Home Page:
    As regards that latest diagram, be advised that many of the properties used are nofollow.

    Also, you will simply get much better results if you don't interlink or interlink sparsely over time, then point every d*follow property to the central site - also over a series of intervals.
     
  13. accelerator_dd

    accelerator_dd Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    2,441
    Likes Received:
    1,005
    Occupation:
    SEO
    Location:
    IM Wonderland
    why does level one spokes have to be connected to money site? Some have to, others don't.

    Also I would recommend you first build them without connecting any of them to the money site. Once you build them some juice to hold, connect one at a time. Blast all of them all the way through. That way it's harder to find a pattern.

    Having a link structure like:

    month1: 5 backlinks with no backlinks to them
    month2: 50 backlinks, all with their own threes

    see the problem here?

    But if you do it like:

    week1: few links from established blogs, building web2.0 with juice(blasting SB and xrumer) without connecting
    week2: more high pr blogs, some articles, more web2.0 building, one connection from nicely established parasite(web2.0)
    week3:connect 2-4 more well established, building few on the side without connectiong
    (repeat week3)

    Of course you should reinforce with various links, not only SB and profiles, throw some diversity (TWIST).

    This will give you best results on both short and long run in my experience.
     
  14. simpleonlinetest

    simpleonlinetest Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    25
    Micallef

    When you say don't interlink are you saying never interlink or wait until the site is indexed by Google then interlink them the way I mentioned?

    I was going to wait until each hub is indexed and has a few backlinks up and running then blast the hub with a hard SB blast then continue the drip system over time to keep the wheel up and running.
     
  15. Micallef

    Micallef Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,345
    Likes Received:
    1,221
    Occupation:
    SE Manipulator
    Location:
    London, UK
    Home Page:
    It all depends on how much risk you are willing to take.

    If you don't interlink, Google will never know anything is amiss, and take all your links at face value.

    If you do interlink, you make your properties more powerful - but now you're playing a dangerous game. Google is attuned to spot unusual or improbable link structures and may end up discrediting the whole thing if you make a mistake.

    I do interlink my networks, but sparsely and well spread over time (i.e. months). These are real long term projects with many manually built high PR back links, so I can't take risks. Often, I link the properties to the central site, and then interlink them several weeks later.
     
  16. simpleonlinetest

    simpleonlinetest Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    25
    Cool...gotcha...thanks for all the info.