MOZ or MAJESTIC? whats your vote?

hi
i wanted to know that when we buy a new domain then should we go for good MOZ metrics of MAJESTC metrics?
please vote and tell their pros and cons
thanks guys!

 

Both are useful.

 

how can both be useful? One of them has to be the winner...

 

there isn't any good metric as all are easy to manipulate. If there is a metric to rely a little on, it's the Majestic CF/TF ratio.

One will never ever be able to avoid a hand check for backlinks, history and anchors.

Cheers
Dan

 

what is the CF/TF for a good expired web 2.0 blog as i have searched and collected a lot of expired blogs and starting to think about making PBNs with them.
which one should i choose? having CF/TF of how much>??

 

the be honest, I didn't heard about MAJESTC , but I heard so many times about MOZ

 

I check both metrics You cant use one metric to determine link and domain quality.

 

MOZ i would say

 

Manual checking is the way to go. Of course, you can use moz/majestic/ahrefs/etc to get an idea but don't make up your decision based on this.

 

Majestic CF/TF ratio < 1.8

http://blog.majestic.com/research/the-ratio-of-majestic-seos-citation-to-trust-flow-as-an-indicator-of-profile-quality/

Hope it helps?
Dan

 

No matter, one or other, but always check the backlinks with ahrefs to see the quality of the backlinks and avoid spam bl.

 

Majestic's TF is perhaps the least manipulable metric.

 

Get Majestic and a 120 day trial from moz.... Rinse and repeat...

 

Currently, TF & CF very important metrics. So, I suggest "MajesticSEO".