Manual penalty to all 20+ sites : Thin Content , any ideas to recover?

All of my sites are uniquely hand written by writers and images are good but
I have received penalty notice from dear google. Penalised all sites on GWM account even some of them are not my sites.
What would be the best action? Because I don't think all sites are bad but how to find the problem one? I already responded with some good sites/blogs showing there is quality content and asked google to give detailed info. Would this work?

It is too much work to update every site and send request. Any ideas?

Best action would be to stop building sites with shit content?

Good luck.

Are you sure they are penalizing all sites? That seems pretty drastic, you might want to check each site in WMT individually for messages pertaining to each site. Unless you had all of your domains linking heavily to each other, I cannot see why all would be popped at the same time. I am not saying it didn't happen, but it just doesn't seem right to me.

Gyuman82 said:

Best action would be to stop building sites with shit content?

Good luck.

Click to expand...

yes I'm actually doing it , sites has very good content people sharing them on FB, social media, ext. one of the blog on this "thin" or "shit" penalised content is <removed URL> and if this is not acceptable then how could we do blogs and sites?

Nicheblogger said:

Are you sure they are penalizing all sites? That seems pretty drastic, you might want to check each site in WMT individually for messages pertaining to each site. Unless you had all of your domains linking heavily to each other, I cannot see why all would be popped at the same time. I am not saying it didn't happen, but it just doesn't seem right to me.

Click to expand...

Happened just after I managed to make $200 a day , of course with months of effort. I heard it is rare cases that people recover from this.

Did you have all your sites on one WMT account?

thedomainkings said:

Did you have all your sites on one WMT account?

Click to expand...

unfortunatelly, yes, was thingking easy to manage but definitely wont do in future.

Best option would be stop saying "Hey Matt, look here are all my websites". I do not use GWM, and I have never had more than four websites hit at a time, and I make plenty of churn and burns.

I think shifting your good sites to some other ip might help. As google sometimes penalize all the sites on the same server.

mickyfu said:

Best option would be stop saying "Hey Matt, look here are all my websites". I do not use GWM, and I have never had more than four websites hit at a time, and I make plenty of churn and burns.

Click to expand...

not using GWT helps? I read this few times before, so if this helps I would not use it again, it is like a childish game, they dont touch you until you start making some money, then penalise. I am thinking if it is worth to spend valuable time for recovery or start making other sites, not very motivating of course
I consider to apply for Bus driver jobs much easier and no stress.

babarali124 said:

I think shifting your good sites to some other ip might help. As google sometimes penalize all the sites on the same server.

Click to expand...

every different hosting costs money and time to manage payments

mahnazkut said:

not using GWT helps? I read this few times before, so if this helps I would not use it again, it is like a childish game, they dont touch you until you start making some money, then penalise. I am thinking if it is worth to spend valuable time for recovery or start making other sites, not very motivating of course
I consider to apply for Bus driver jobs much easier and no stress.

Click to expand...

Well we will never actually know, but I would say 20 websites on one GWM account is a good sign that they use this tool to slap all your sites. The way I look at it, is at the end of the day GWM makes me fk all money and it is something I can easily do without.

I don't think google has looked at you. Unless your running scripts to it.

mahnazkut said:

yes I'm actually doing it , sites has very good content people sharing them on FB, social media, ext. one of the blog on this "thin" or "shit" penalised content is this : http://icelolly-holidays.blogspot.com and if this is not acceptable then how could we do blogs and sites?

Click to expand...

Dude, that site sucks in a lot of ways... some offense.

The captions on the images are "Hotel in [random location]", "Lake in [random location]", and "Caucasian Woman"?

The last paragraph is as follows:

There are so much to discover in this land. So many languages spoken as well as many cultures formed. Because of the landscape, people were isolated for many thousand years. The main reason for this rich culture and diversity is this isolation by mountains.

That is one paragraph and there are 3 blatant grammar errors. The last sentence barely makes sense. If you're writing the content yourself, you need to either stop writing it yourself and hire someone else, or proofread better. Your intentions might be good but the text itself looks like it was written with a spinner, which is why G penalized it.

As for all 20 of them being penalized at once, I'd have to agree with everyone else here - unless you were linking them together, if the only footprint is that they were in the same Webmaster's account, then stop using G webmaster tools or, at the very least, space them out between different accounts.

Good luck! My apologies if this came off as harsh.

Jared

Were you using the same GWT account? If yes then that's the reason.

The first sentence and you've spelt of "o f", paragraphs that are continued sentences?
Your blogs are spammed to fuck with keyword links............

OP, that site looks very poor and a quick look at the sites linking to it reveal other sites of equally poor content

http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=icelolly-holidays.blogspot.co.uk/&src=mb

Several of the sites are on the same IP and most seem to be interlinked.

mahnazkut said:

yes I'm actually doing it , sites has very good content people sharing them on FB, social media, ext. one of the blog on this "thin" or "shit" penalised content is this : http://icelolly-holidays.blogspot.com and if this is not acceptable then how could we do blogs and sites?

Click to expand...

You have 15 posts in 2014. If you have lower content, and lots of links, then eventually Google may manually review your site.

Have you ever tried out one of the surf for money, or links, types of sites? There is a toolbar or something similar and you advance from page to page... well, my brother's best friend since we were in middle school works for Google. He explained it to me like this, the system flags sites and they come up in the screen of the quality controllers. Then they make a decision, and that marks it as a manual review.

So, what happened to you is some twit had your site pop up in a screen and they marked it as thin content. I looked at the site and it looks thin to me. Mostly pics, and wiki stuff. It's crap content, let's be honest here. You threw it together.

My advice is to keep your yap shut, and do some damage control before you ask for re-evaluation etc. Then approach it with HUMILITY... for a few hundred bucks you can get dozens of articles to spread around. Make them wordy and cut back on the pics. I get it, you want mobile phone content, but you went too sparse. Only after you add content should ask for a review.

Those guys at Google hate you. They hate me. They hate everyone. They suck! They get bonuses for catching asshats, so if you want to be an asshat, then you have to be a sneaky and humble Black-Hatter... do the damage control, then tell them they were probably right, and that you were just trying to make it nice to read on mobile phones, and you want to contribute meaningful content to the web, and you believe they are the ones who righty decide what is best ... yada yada... give them a reach-around so they will roll over and say it was good enough....

Now remove your URL you stupid asshat, because Google is here, on these forums, and you are asking to be put on the shit-list.

A simple manual review would flag the site as pure crap after reading the first paragraph. Sorry to sound harsh, but it is the truth. The content sucks. The $5 articles and $1/100 words crap that everyone around here seems to think is the norm gets you pure shit.

So...they see one of your sites. They think "God this is pure crap...let's see what other turds are in the bowl"...and uncover all of your other sites.

The sooner people can eliminate the following terms from their vocab the better off they will be:

"hand written" (hand written? no shit...do people write with their feet???)
"native writer" (Sorry...but I have NEVER heard of someone here in the US refer to themselves as a native)
"not spunned" (Such a grammar cluster fu#k of a term)

Anyway, there are several reasons why you got pinched...but your content is crap. Look at your site in the shoes of some random person that will stumble on your website. No idea how people can put up such crappy sites and then wonder why they got nailed. Stop putting up crap.

Contact a content company in the US and ask them "How much is a 500 words article" and they will laugh at you. REAL content....QUALITY content....is big bucks. Not on a freelance website (because that is all pure crap - those silly natives) - spend money on REAL content.

Thanks so much for critics and help, I am amazed with the support in this forum, very very helpful . Reading them now..