1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

[KW research] MS and TT contradiction.

Discussion in 'BlackHat Lounge' started by shiningeyes, Jan 2, 2012.

  1. shiningeyes

    shiningeyes BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    297
    For the Same keyword, MS shows this result:

    [​IMG]

    And TT says it is Relatively Easy:

    [​IMG]

    Trusted TT and went for an EMD with over 18000 exact searches!

    How do you evaluate this decision?
    The topper page is of big fat Wikipedia! Other pages are also somewhat related to the KW.
     
  2. thedon23

    thedon23 Elite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,759
    Likes Received:
    1,268
    If I had to rely on one, I'd pick MS. But I always do a manual analysis of the top 10 before targeting a niche. There is only so much those tools can tell you.
     
  3. shiningeyes

    shiningeyes BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    297
    Actually i have checked manually and the results of TT are precise.
    My KW was like "brown fox" and in URLs was like "fox brown" , According to MS it was in Headings but TT said it was not and i personally think that "brown fox" is different from "fox brown".
    I personally feel that with the advantage of EMD i will be able to rank it, however the competition seems tough.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2012