John Mueller Says Google Ignores Most Web 2.0 and Article Links

assphuck

Senior Member

Feb 22, 2009

1,198

909

• Apr 11, 2014

• #1

As the post title says, John Mueller of Google stated that they ignore most web 2.0 and article links now. His post can be viewed here, where he states the following:

We're already mostly ignoring those links (just like we're ignoring the "web 2.0" / Pinterest / YouTube / article / etc links),

Click to expand...

I did not see any other posts here related to John's comments. Any opinions?

 

1337python

Regular Member

Jun 18, 2013

395

239

• Apr 11, 2014

• #2

He's full of shit, it has never been easier to rank with web 2.0

 

lancis

Elite Member

Jul 31, 2010

1,682

2,443

• Apr 11, 2014

• #3

We're already mostly ignoring John Mueller (just like we're ignoring the "web spam team" / Matt Cutts / Google+ / etc)

 

F

ficfroc

Regular Member

Feb 14, 2010

486

273

• Apr 11, 2014

• #4

Okay, this is the ultimate proof that everything that comes from google's mouth is bullshit.

 

Gyuman82

Elite Member

Nov 15, 2011

1,865

1,146

• Apr 11, 2014

• #5

You can't buy into this Google propaganda bullshit.

You have to test everything on your own and not just take what you hear as truth.

 

prab1996

Elite Member

Jan 8, 2013

3,492

2,042

• Apr 11, 2014

• #6

then get back to xrumer forum sign links.
-=-

 

M

mickyfu

Banned due to many warnings

Dec 14, 2011

9,430

27,940

• Apr 11, 2014

• #7

Of course he does, and that would be for the one reason that Web2 are most effective at ranking sites. Google's anti spam tactics are pathetically child like.

 

miluge

Regular Member

Oct 26, 2012

233

94

• Apr 11, 2014

• #8

Ha ha ha! Ask whoever you want you can rank using web 2.0's, that's a good ol' bullshit from Google.

 

A

affarmy

Regular Member

Aug 10, 2010

405

95

• Apr 11, 2014

• #9

miluge said:

Ha ha ha! Ask whoever you want you can rank using web 2.0's, that's a good ol' bullshit from Google.

Click to expand...

Not conjecture , but PURE BS-

Proof: I just YESTERDAY scrapeboxed a web 2.0 (Docsite) page to the top of the serps now for two days for all google datacenters-

pure spam backlinks and NOTHING ELSE.
Above PA/DA sites of 80, sites with 15+ years aging, etc etc.

Don't even READ or listen to the talking heads: see the serps and carry on

AA

 

umerjutt00

Elite Member

Oct 28, 2011

4,371

2,492

• Apr 11, 2014

• #10

I call this bullshit.

 

lietuvis002

BANNED

Aug 3, 2012

2,385

2,588

• Apr 11, 2014

• #11

@Mueller :bryce:

 

webmasterbd

Elite Member

Dec 2, 2009

5,396

2,998

• Apr 11, 2014

• #12

Well few weeks ago there was rumor flying around you cant rank YT as G rolled out new updates,but I am still been able to rank my new videos & bank with CPA.Hallelujah!

 

safex

Elite Member

Dec 28, 2009

3,874

606

• Apr 11, 2014

• #13

Ignore him and Give him Results with Just Web 2.0 Links. and than Ask If Ignores why you got Ranked.

 

UrsuAke

Power Member

Sep 28, 2011

750

1,045

• Apr 11, 2014

• #14

They systematically eliminated all link sources except for a few, web 2.0's, guest posts, article links ergo contextual links being the most trustworthy after social links these days.

If they pull the plug on contextual links, the search engine of Google is dead or close to it. Ain't gonna happen, and contextual links will NEVER be a source of penalty, because it will mean that the whole WWW will be penalized, which will mean that we will all be at the same level again. Get the paradigm?

 

gray123

Junior Member

Sep 29, 2009

187

43

• Apr 11, 2014

• #15

He is talking sh*t, I'm not the only one with results to prove him wrong!

 

BlueSteele

Regular Member

Apr 10, 2010

282

138

• Apr 11, 2014

• #16

I've been on some Google hangouts w. John in the past and he's usually a pretty straight shooter - comparatively anyways. Curious if he is eluding to something to come perhaps? Surely 2.0s are still working, granted, no 2.0 I push isn't backed with tiers of GSA spam...Perhaps alone they aren't looked at much?