Is this possible to rank? [No exact searches and .com avaible]

C

chopter

Junior Member

Nov 6, 2011

180

34

• Dec 4, 2011

• #1

So could i rank this keyword easily? It has 90k monthly searches. If i do "My keyword" search there is no results that have that keyword as a title. Also .com is avaible.

I added Market Samurai Seo Competition picture as a attachment. Please take a look.

 

Attachments

• 
  tk.PNG

  17.2 KB · Views: 38
• 
  tk2.PNG

  19 KB · Views: 27

Last edited: Dec 4, 2011

W

WizIMS

Power Member

Sep 24, 2011

685

886

• Dec 4, 2011

• #2

Yes we can

 

charlie3

Senior Member

Oct 4, 2009

1,078

493

• Dec 4, 2011

• #3

Just from that Market Samurai picture, that looks tough... not saying you can't do it though

 

C

chopter

Junior Member

Nov 6, 2011

180

34

• Dec 4, 2011

• #4

Added new pic. This is same but with 70k searches and .com avaibl.e

 

alaltaierii

Supreme Member

Jun 11, 2010

1,494

388

• Dec 4, 2011

• #5

Check your competitors backlinks with seomoz or other tools and if it's ok with you, just give it a shot.

 

C

chopter

Junior Member

Nov 6, 2011

180

34

• Dec 4, 2011

• #6

Competitors are big sites that have lots of backlinks but they dont have that keyword as a article title or anything. So what you think?

 

C

chopter

Junior Member

Nov 6, 2011

180

34

• Dec 4, 2011

• #7

xenix9 said:

easy, lol

Click to expand...

Is this sarcasm or really is it easy? Sorry im just 16 years old dont know these thinks so well yet.

 

johnnyflex

Junior Member

Jun 23, 2010

159

19

• Dec 4, 2011

• #8

looks hard.. but depend on what strategy you're going to make.

For me, i wouldn't take this one. It will be a waste of time. But if you have the time and you want to challenge yourself, then you can go ahead.

 

D

DrumBass

BANNED

May 18, 2010

134

48

• Dec 4, 2011

• #9

It all depends on your own abilities to compete with the competitor sites.

Check out where do their backlinks come from and if you think you can beat it give it a shot (onsite SEO should be done properly anyway).

Cheers