1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is this common practice?

Discussion in 'Adwords' started by IcedCube, Aug 16, 2010.

  1. IcedCube

    IcedCube Junior Member

    Mar 2, 2009
    Likes Received:
    I recently re-read the Adwords Black book, rewatched PPC Formula 1 and watched some Joel Peterson seminars. According to them, the way to get cheap traffic that's highly targeted is brand hijacking (or domain hijacking). So I picked a Niche and began a 4-hour search of companies in this Niche.

    When I went to the Google Keyword Tool External, I typed in a particular product I had my eye on, and they gave me a list of related keywords. 5 of these keywords were in a major niche, highly targeted, and had at least 60,000 searches a month.

    However, I went and searched with 10 private proxies in 3 different countries, and no matter where I looked, not one ad showed. Making a campaign in Google confirmed my suspicion, namely that I'd get a monopoly on those keywords with $0.05 bids per ad.

    So I ask you: is this common practice, to have 50 competitors on a 18,000 searches/mo keyword, yet have a similar keyword with 60,000 US searches a month that no one cares to bid on, even if just to get the $0.05 ads?

    If so, someone should've included THAT in their e-books.

    (No, I won't share the niche, but it's just a single step down from weight loss.)