This thread is more like a survey/Q&A Since I am new to all three services and have been using Linklicious, Dripable for a month and linkpushing.net for three weeks. side note: Am I wrong in saying that getting indexed in google and getting credit for a backlink are two different things? From what I can tell, properties pointing to my money site do appear indexed and yet when I do a Yahoo site explorer search on my money site, no backlink for that indexed web property exists. Am I dealing with apples and oranges here since my focus is on google but I use yahoo site explorer to acknowledge backlinks? Okay onto my real reason for starting this thread So I have been using the $14.50 service from linklicious, the 50 dollar service from dripable and the linkpushing.net service for around a month (5 linkpushes). I have around 2k feeds accumulated in linklicious since adding backlinks created from 5 different dripable projects on a regular basis. I feed all my linkpushing.net linkpushes, my own manually created web2.0 linkpushes, and the dripable backlinks to Linklicious. The dripable links feed the linkpushes ONLY and I only build high quality niche specific backlinks to my money sites directly, which get indexed rather quick via BMD and show up in yahoo site explorer. As a means of testing both linklicious, dripable and linkpushing.net, I have made no other indexing/backlinking credit attempts, other than running my link push properties through Book Marking Demon because I know that works and I need properties to verify backlinks too. After a continuous month of linklicious, dripable and web2.0 linkpushing (three weeks for linkpushing.net) I have noticed no effect whatsoever on serp rankings for any of my money sites, nor have the dripable backlinks been given any backlink credit (I look at credit as actually showing up in yahoo site explorer when you do a backlink check on your site. Whether or not it helps or hurts the rankings is besides the point), like I would have hoped for. Also, doing a site explorer search on my money properties yields no results on the linkpush properties. Just the manual high quality edu/gov links I have created and the a few social bookmarking sites used in BMD. A yahoo site explorer search on my linkpush properties show one, two and mostly zero indexed backlinks from dripable. What am I missing here? Why are these properties or backlinks not getting picked up by site explorer? My sites are all roughly a 6 months to a year old. I have one site, that a friend of mine owns, that is over ten years old! He built it and never touched it after it was launched, It's a great medical site (he's a doc) so quality is not a question! It too is experiencing the same effect. The only backlinks linking to his site are the links coming from two of his other sites, which I told him to backlink to about two weeks ago. My presumption is that either linklicious isn't really doing its job in getting links indexed or that google is ranking all of these backlink strategies rather low now. Or yahoo site explorer is way behind the power curve and has nothing to do with rss feeds generated by linklicious. I would hope that google and yahoo would deviate a little but still be on the same page. I feel they are on the same page because of no google dance. Do you think google is crawling the rss feeds over at linklicious and acknowledging the backlinks and linkpush properties but deciding not to give credit? I would think a google dance would be in order if they were trying to figure out what to do with serp rankings but I have yet to see any results. Perhaps to soon to tell? The Yahoo site explore thing just baffles me. I would hope to see hundreds of dripable backlinks by now pointing to my linkpushes and my linkpushes pointing at my money sites. Im looking forward to hearing what you guys think.. Thanks, Gene I do realize that a month is a very short time to draw such conclusions but I can usually get things moving faster manually and I hate manual work like this.