Is Link Energizer a load of BS?

shdwmyst

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
169
Reaction score
8
Age
42
Website
www.cashleveragingpros.com
I was reading a sales copy here:

hxxp://backlink-energizer.c0m/

Is this hyped up or could it really help keep backlinks active? If you have a better suggestion that would be great too! :)
 
Last edited:

pirondi

Power Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
588
Reaction score
127
This is a wordpress plugin,that will post your links to web 2.0 sites and can post to 7 self hosted wordpress.

The plugin gets the content of rss feeds that you will provide and will post the content in the web 2.0 with your links.

Yes it works for indexing links,but you will need to make links to your web 2.0 properties.
 

nnickles66

Newbie
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value? Plus any future-proofing efforts need to consider the lead time for search engines to get wise and ignore this tactic. Probably not worth the effort. Like most things Google can wise up to, better to be dumb and drop lots of links than spend time trying to be semi-smart.

Are people still trying to define and use the term "Web 2.0" ? I don't want to de-rail the topic but it's such a silly term. It's been so long since I've seen something on-line that doesn't meet the criteria of "Web 2.0" that it seems absurd to still call things "Web 2.0" like it still means that much?
 

eplekedut

Registered Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Messages
91
Reaction score
24
yeah BS... SE indexed BIE more quickly then Backlinkenergizer... after 24 hours SE still not indexed my backlinkenergizer site
 

sputnik11

Junior Member
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
106
Reaction score
46
The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value? Plus any future-proofing efforts need to consider the lead time for search engines to get wise and ignore this tactic. Probably not worth the effort. Like most things Google can wise up to, better to be dumb and drop lots of links than spend time trying to be semi-smart.

Are people still trying to define and use the term "Web 2.0" ? I don't want to de-rail the topic but it's such a silly term. It's been so long since I've seen something on-line that doesn't meet the criteria of "Web 2.0" that it seems absurd to still call things "Web 2.0" like it still means that much?

Who gives a flying shit about what web 2.0 is literally defined as ? What do you call a group of free blogging sites like

wordpress.com
posterous
vox
tumblr
livejournal
multiply

nearly everyone recognizes web 2.0 sites vs. full text - doo follow FREE Blogging sites

anal retentive much?
 

sputnik11

Junior Member
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
106
Reaction score
46
The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value? Plus any future-proofing efforts need to consider the lead time for search engines to get wise and ignore this tactic. Probably not worth the effort. Like most things Google can wise up to, better to be dumb and drop lots of links than spend time trying to be semi-smart.

Are people still trying to define and use the term "Web 2.0" ? I don't want to de-rail the topic but it's such a silly term. It's been so long since I've seen something on-line that doesn't meet the criteria of "Web 2.0" that it seems absurd to still call things "Web 2.0" like it still means that much?

LOL ....

exactly - google's going to devise a change to their algo to discount in-content - html anchor text backlinks from blog posts ...

Wait ... ohhhh no they wont really do that will they?

Its better to just make a blog post full of nothing but 200 shit - no anchor text raw urls of profile backlinks to your money site.

google would rather devise an algo to discount in content anchors surrounded by real content - than a page of 200 posts with each post = 200+ lists of raw urls ... because well its not smart to try and outsmart google.

The smart by stupidty method .... hrmmmm who'd a thunk it?
 

sputnik11

Junior Member
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
106
Reaction score
46
yeah BS... SE indexed BIE more quickly then Backlinkenergizer... after 24 hours SE still not indexed my backlinkenergizer site

Wow ... brilliant - after 24 hrs!

I checked mine after 24 seconds - and not a single one - you mean a backlink to a backlink takes google bot more than 24 hrs to find?

Shouldnt google find it the instant its posted - all these tools are pure shit!
 

sputnik11

Junior Member
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
106
Reaction score
46
The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value?

does google judge a page's uniqueness by each individual post on a page or ...

the sum total of the content - taken as a whole on a page?
 
Top