1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is Link Energizer a load of BS?

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by shdwmyst, Sep 7, 2010.

  1. shdwmyst

    shdwmyst Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    7
    Occupation:
    IT professional - Next up, Marketing Guru!
    Location:
    USA
    Home Page:
    I was reading a sales copy here:

    hxxp://backlink-energizer.c0m/

    Is this hyped up or could it really help keep backlinks active? If you have a better suggestion that would be great too! :)
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2010
  2. shdwmyst

    shdwmyst Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    7
    Occupation:
    IT professional - Next up, Marketing Guru!
    Location:
    USA
    Home Page:
    After doing some more reading, is BIE the same type of tool? If so, which is better?
     
  3. pirondi

    pirondi Power Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    118
    This is a wordpress plugin,that will post your links to web 2.0 sites and can post to 7 self hosted wordpress.

    The plugin gets the content of rss feeds that you will provide and will post the content in the web 2.0 with your links.

    Yes it works for indexing links,but you will need to make links to your web 2.0 properties.
     
  4. nnickles66

    nnickles66 Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2008
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    1
    The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value? Plus any future-proofing efforts need to consider the lead time for search engines to get wise and ignore this tactic. Probably not worth the effort. Like most things Google can wise up to, better to be dumb and drop lots of links than spend time trying to be semi-smart.

    Are people still trying to define and use the term "Web 2.0" ? I don't want to de-rail the topic but it's such a silly term. It's been so long since I've seen something on-line that doesn't meet the criteria of "Web 2.0" that it seems absurd to still call things "Web 2.0" like it still means that much?
     
  5. guruslayer23

    guruslayer23 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    61
    Occupation:
    World Domination
    Location:
    International Pimpin
    To me its really a waste of time!

    But that is just my opinion!
     
  6. eplekedut

    eplekedut Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    23
    yeah BS... SE indexed BIE more quickly then Backlinkenergizer... after 24 hours SE still not indexed my backlinkenergizer site
     
  7. sputnik11

    sputnik11 Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2009
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    46
    Occupation:
    International Man of Mystery
    Location:
    OC-SoCal
    Who gives a flying shit about what web 2.0 is literally defined as ? What do you call a group of free blogging sites like

    wordpress.com
    posterous
    vox
    tumblr
    livejournal
    multiply

    nearly everyone recognizes web 2.0 sites vs. full text - doo follow FREE Blogging sites

    anal retentive much?
     
  8. sputnik11

    sputnik11 Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2009
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    46
    Occupation:
    International Man of Mystery
    Location:
    OC-SoCal
    LOL ....

    exactly - google's going to devise a change to their algo to discount in-content - html anchor text backlinks from blog posts ...

    Wait ... ohhhh no they wont really do that will they?

    Its better to just make a blog post full of nothing but 200 shit - no anchor text raw urls of profile backlinks to your money site.

    google would rather devise an algo to discount in content anchors surrounded by real content - than a page of 200 posts with each post = 200+ lists of raw urls ... because well its not smart to try and outsmart google.

    The smart by stupidty method .... hrmmmm who'd a thunk it?
     
  9. sputnik11

    sputnik11 Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2009
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    46
    Occupation:
    International Man of Mystery
    Location:
    OC-SoCal
    Wow ... brilliant - after 24 hrs!

    I checked mine after 24 seconds - and not a single one - you mean a backlink to a backlink takes google bot more than 24 hrs to find?

    Shouldnt google find it the instant its posted - all these tools are pure shit!
     
  10. sputnik11

    sputnik11 Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2009
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    46
    Occupation:
    International Man of Mystery
    Location:
    OC-SoCal
    does google judge a page's uniqueness by each individual post on a page or ...

    the sum total of the content - taken as a whole on a page?