Is Link Energizer a load of BS?
- Thread starter shdwmyst
- Start date
pirondi
Power Member
- Jan 5, 2010
- 614
- 152
This is a wordpress plugin,that will post your links to web 2.0 sites and can post to 7 self hosted wordpress.
The plugin gets the content of rss feeds that you will provide and will post the content in the web 2.0 with your links.
Yes it works for indexing links,but you will need to make links to your web 2.0 properties.
The plugin gets the content of rss feeds that you will provide and will post the content in the web 2.0 with your links.
Yes it works for indexing links,but you will need to make links to your web 2.0 properties.
nnickles66
Newbie
- Dec 11, 2008
- 12
- 1
The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value? Plus any future-proofing efforts need to consider the lead time for search engines to get wise and ignore this tactic. Probably not worth the effort. Like most things Google can wise up to, better to be dumb and drop lots of links than spend time trying to be semi-smart.
Are people still trying to define and use the term "Web 2.0" ? I don't want to de-rail the topic but it's such a silly term. It's been so long since I've seen something on-line that doesn't meet the criteria of "Web 2.0" that it seems absurd to still call things "Web 2.0" like it still means that much?
Are people still trying to define and use the term "Web 2.0" ? I don't want to de-rail the topic but it's such a silly term. It's been so long since I've seen something on-line that doesn't meet the criteria of "Web 2.0" that it seems absurd to still call things "Web 2.0" like it still means that much?
guruslayer23
Junior Member
- Sep 26, 2008
- 117
- 63
To me its really a waste of time!
But that is just my opinion!
But that is just my opinion!
Who gives a flying shit about what web 2.0 is literally defined as ? What do you call a group of free blogging sites like
wordpress.com
posterous
vox
tumblr
livejournal
multiply
nearly everyone recognizes web 2.0 sites vs. full text - doo follow FREE Blogging sites
anal retentive much?
LOL ....
exactly - google's going to devise a change to their algo to discount in-content - html anchor text backlinks from blog posts ...
Wait ... ohhhh no they wont really do that will they?
Its better to just make a blog post full of nothing but 200 shit - no anchor text raw urls of profile backlinks to your money site.
google would rather devise an algo to discount in content anchors surrounded by real content - than a page of 200 posts with each post = 200+ lists of raw urls ... because well its not smart to try and outsmart google.
The smart by stupidty method .... hrmmmm who'd a thunk it?
Wow ... brilliant - after 24 hrs!
I checked mine after 24 seconds - and not a single one - you mean a backlink to a backlink takes google bot more than 24 hrs to find?
Shouldnt google find it the instant its posted - all these tools are pure shit!