Is Link Energizer a load of BS?

S

shdwmyst

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
169
Reaction score
8
Age
44
Website
www.cashleveragingpros.com
I was reading a sales copy here:

hxxp://backlink-energizer.c0m/

Is this hyped up or could it really help keep backlinks active? If you have a better suggestion that would be great too! :)
 
Last edited:
Advertise on BHW
This is a wordpress plugin,that will post your links to web 2.0 sites and can post to 7 self hosted wordpress.

The plugin gets the content of rss feeds that you will provide and will post the content in the web 2.0 with your links.

Yes it works for indexing links,but you will need to make links to your web 2.0 properties.
 
The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value? Plus any future-proofing efforts need to consider the lead time for search engines to get wise and ignore this tactic. Probably not worth the effort. Like most things Google can wise up to, better to be dumb and drop lots of links than spend time trying to be semi-smart.

Are people still trying to define and use the term "Web 2.0" ? I don't want to de-rail the topic but it's such a silly term. It's been so long since I've seen something on-line that doesn't meet the criteria of "Web 2.0" that it seems absurd to still call things "Web 2.0" like it still means that much?
 
yeah BS... SE indexed BIE more quickly then Backlinkenergizer... after 24 hours SE still not indexed my backlinkenergizer site
 
nnickles66 said:
The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value? Plus any future-proofing efforts need to consider the lead time for search engines to get wise and ignore this tactic. Probably not worth the effort. Like most things Google can wise up to, better to be dumb and drop lots of links than spend time trying to be semi-smart.

Are people still trying to define and use the term "Web 2.0" ? I don't want to de-rail the topic but it's such a silly term. It's been so long since I've seen something on-line that doesn't meet the criteria of "Web 2.0" that it seems absurd to still call things "Web 2.0" like it still means that much?
Click to expand...

Who gives a flying shit about what web 2.0 is literally defined as ? What do you call a group of free blogging sites like

wordpress.com
posterous
vox
tumblr
livejournal
multiply

nearly everyone recognizes web 2.0 sites vs. full text - doo follow FREE Blogging sites

anal retentive much?
 
nnickles66 said:
The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value? Plus any future-proofing efforts need to consider the lead time for search engines to get wise and ignore this tactic. Probably not worth the effort. Like most things Google can wise up to, better to be dumb and drop lots of links than spend time trying to be semi-smart.

Are people still trying to define and use the term "Web 2.0" ? I don't want to de-rail the topic but it's such a silly term. It's been so long since I've seen something on-line that doesn't meet the criteria of "Web 2.0" that it seems absurd to still call things "Web 2.0" like it still means that much?
Click to expand...

LOL ....

exactly - google's going to devise a change to their algo to discount in-content - html anchor text backlinks from blog posts ...

Wait ... ohhhh no they wont really do that will they?

Its better to just make a blog post full of nothing but 200 shit - no anchor text raw urls of profile backlinks to your money site.

google would rather devise an algo to discount in content anchors surrounded by real content - than a page of 200 posts with each post = 200+ lists of raw urls ... because well its not smart to try and outsmart google.

The smart by stupidty method .... hrmmmm who'd a thunk it?
 
eplekedut said:
yeah BS... SE indexed BIE more quickly then Backlinkenergizer... after 24 hours SE still not indexed my backlinkenergizer site
Click to expand...

Wow ... brilliant - after 24 hrs!

I checked mine after 24 seconds - and not a single one - you mean a backlink to a backlink takes google bot more than 24 hrs to find?

Shouldnt google find it the instant its posted - all these tools are pure shit!
 
The idea of stuffing a page with RSS data to keep it "fresh" seems wise now but how are you keeping the content unique enough to give it value?
Click to expand...

does google judge a page's uniqueness by each individual post on a page or ...

the sum total of the content - taken as a whole on a page?
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Networking Downloads

Marketplace

Content / Copywriting Hosting Images, Logos & Videos Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design Misc

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping

BlackHatWorld

BHW Merch Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge Dispute Resolution

Other

Domain Name Forum IM Journeys Web Hosting Newsletter
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features and essential functions on BlackHatWorld and other forums. These functions are unrelated to ads, such as internal links and images. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock