ok... i have been thinking bout this a bit... and thought i would get your opinion on this! a company got 2% stake in facebook at something like 200mil making facebook worth $10bil... here is the news story... Code: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aEDJht80MfdM&refer=europe now... facebook is yet to turn profitable..... and i dont see much growth happening... i see a more downside risk to that asset than a upside growth...! anybody can explain why somebody would be so stupid to pay $10bil for something that does not make money and is in a field where things change so fast... i mean look at things... 4-5 years back it was myspace... 2 years back it was facebook.... now its twitter... why did that company get such a high valuation? am i missing something? i am confused... the numbers just dont add up!