Internal linking: First Link Priority Rule (SEO myth?)

kimjensen

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
151
Reaction score
42
I was refreshing my knowledge of internal link architecture and found this guide here from 2020:

https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/guide-making-the-most-of-internal-link-building.1212211/

The author claims, with a high degree of confidence, that navigation links/footer links would render internal contextual links more or less useless:

"The basic premise of the First Link Priority Rule is that when a page links more than once to the same target url, Google will ignore all the other links after the first one."

He makes an example with having the word 'Bats' in the navigation:

So Google ignores the "wood baseball bats" link in the copy, which is the actual KW you are trying to rank, and uses "Bats". After all, who in their right mind is trying to rank Bats or even Baseball Bats. That is not low hanging fruit, which is where I prefer to play and bank.

I find this hard to believe, but I have no data to back it up, and I'd like to get your opinion on this here in 2024.

Such navigation links often lead to the site's core pages and often to the money pages, so I'm very interested in figuring out how to efficiently internal link to such pages.

In my own case, I have KW-rich navigational links + bread crumbs AND some contextual links.
 
the first link priority rule is mostly myth google values contextual links more
 
the first link priority rule is mostly myth google values contextual links more

Google has evolved but the theory is still sound. I would not recommend using "best baseball bats or anything else" in your nav bar, footer or sidebars and simply use 'baseball bats'. My most successful sites minimise links in the sitewide nav areas and show Google the path through on-page internal links where you can be extremely aggressive in the terms you use.

Google has evolved, but then again, so have we to match.
 
Google has evolved but the theory is still sound. I would not recommend using "best baseball bats or anything else" in your nav bar, footer or sidebars and simply use 'baseball bats'. My most successful sites minimise links in the sitewide nav areas and show Google the path through on-page internal links where you can be extremely aggressive in the terms you use.

Google has evolved, but then again, so have we to match.
i see your point but minimizing links can limit user navigation. a balanced approach might be better. show clear paths, but don't overdo keywords. user experience still matters.
 
i see your point but minimizing links can limit user navigation. a balanced approach might be better. show clear paths, but don't overdo keywords. user experience still matters.

Nowadays it is just about being sensible. Not so long ago we hammered keywords and it worked, then Google got smart and adapted, so did we. Nothing wrong with a decent nav structure but it depends on how people get to your pages. 99.9% of my pages are from organic search, so doing what Google likes is important. Users do not navigate internally from nav bars, so they are minimised as mostly pointless. I do use internal links in the actual posts which users follow. These are what is important to me and what seems to work well.

Not rocket science but works according to what Google rewards. Other sites could be different as perhaps they rely on a HUGE % of page visits via internal nav bars. Mine is organic user intent buying clicks, or information intent clicks from Google.
 
Nowadays it is just about being sensible. Not so long ago we hammered keywords and it worked, then Google got smart and adapted, so did we. Nothing wrong with a decent nav structure but it depends on how people get to your pages. 99.9% of my pages are from organic search, so doing what Google likes is important. Users do not navigate internally from nav bars, so they are minimised as mostly pointless. I do use internal links in the actual posts which users follow. These are what is important to me and what seems to work well.

Not rocket science but works according to what Google rewards. Other sites could be different as perhaps they rely on a HUGE % of page visits via internal nav bars. Mine is organic user intent buying clicks, or information intent clicks from Google.
I am interested, what kind of site do you offer that works like that?
 
I am interested, what kind of site do you offer that works like that?
I do not offer any sites but I do create my own blog sites in a variety of niches. Again, nothing complicated just decent content with decent links.
 
Back
Top