Indexing links in google in 2017

depends on content quality

SainaGroup said:

depends on content quality

Click to expand...

What does ?

Link indexing ?

SainaGroup said:

depends on content quality

Click to expand...

No it doesn't
You can have a professor written 10k words indepth article about a subject posted on a web 2.0 and might never get indexed. On the other hand u can have a 200 word spun piece of crap backed with some links that will get indexed.

Da does not matter for indexing in google. I have built links with da 90 + and they won't index. I have links with 10+ and they index. A real mystery.

Google staff here, Its nothing like that, we fucked with few codes in our algo while updating. That the reason google is not indexing links anymore. We are trying to fix this issue.

markb9876 said:

Anyone noticed how hard it's got to index links in google.

I bought a package of links, good quality, they were sent for indexing, and 2 months later when using info:sample link, only found 16 links out if 290 indexed.

I found the same thing also using commercial indexers in sep Oct and nov 2016. I used 2 of the well known indexing services and checking after 2 weeks, less than 5 % of links had actualky indexed.

Anyone else find the same?

Click to expand...

Google has definitely slowed down the indexing process in their war on SEO. It seems that some links will never get indexed no matter how many other links or social signals you throw at it - and that includes high quality pages - though I think they will eb small in number if the content is good.

ThopHayt said:

Its because Google isn't stupid and they recognize a lot of the old spammy methods. Wouldn't be shocked if some "services" made it take longer lol.

Just build better quality links, with better content and hit them with a small dripfeed of socials and you might find your life easier. And if its a web2.0 don't forget to post fresh content every week, people forget to update old web2.0's with new non-link content. Google knows what spammy shit links are and they don't like indexing them.

-ThopHayt

Click to expand...

I have some very high quality Tier 1 links that Google will just not index from expired 2.0s with unique well written (paid for) content. Lower quality Tier 2 pages that link to the tier 1 got indexed after. It seems on expired 2.0s (and domains) Google picks up the original page but won't index the changes if it has a link on it. I have no doubt that in time Google will pick the changes up. But after testing this I know that Google is up to something - post non linking content and it gets indexed very fast, make changes and the changes are picked up and page re-indexed fast. But, put a backlink on it and ... boom ... the indexing rate goes down dramatically! I'm convinced Google is deliberately slowing down the indexing rate of pages with links on them. No indexing service can do anything to combat this if it is built into the algo.

However, I have found that sending social signals to the linking pages helps a lot better than using indexing sites or sending more links to the page.

irishsolar said:

Google is deliberately slowing down the indexing rate of pages with links on them

Click to expand...

Wouldn't surprise me. They are probably running certain types of sites through a second automated screening process before posting new linked content from them. Web2.0's probably being near the top of that list.

-ThopHayt

Links from wordpress.org/plugins and wordpress.org/themes and profiles.wordpress.org is good indexing and ranking by google.

I build more lower tiers links to make it index faster. Additional is using some index service, in case it's web2.0 or tier1 links. Use some social signals and it will index faster a little bit.
It's hard to index links in big G these day. So using another methods or always active on indexing links is better than do nothing or just wait and pray.

You Will Google Indexing Then Best Way White Hat SEO.

Thanks

You Will Google Indexing Then Best Way White Hat SEO.

Thanks

i never beleieved in these indexing services.

I agree. Indexing services seem to do more harm than good.

I think the best way to index your links is if you build fairly good links (meaning that they have to be from decent sites) to your backlink URLs.

You do that by yourself and not trusting some shady indexing service that might be submitting your website to spammy directories.

Don't bother about indexers. Do a tired link building campaign with search engine ranker or ranker x.