1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How to submit backlink of our website on wikipedia

Discussion in 'White Hat SEO' started by incrediable, Feb 10, 2016.

  1. incrediable

    incrediable Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2010
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    211
    Wikipedia is one of the most visited websites in the world, providing unbiased information to millions of unique visitors a day. They are an online traffic source just waiting to be taken advantage of, but it's not as easy as it sounds. A lot of you out there might be wondering whether or not you should use Wikipedia for SEO purposes, and my answer will always be YES. When I say this, you should not immediately jump over to Wikipedia and see how many times you can get your links in different articles, because this is the absolute worst thing you can do. This is one of the most effective link building techniques out there, but you have to know what you're doing. Before you even think about using Wikipedia to your advantage, there's some things you have to know.
    Wikipedia is nonprofit. They don't do this for any financial gain, so there number one goal is to provide neutral, unbiased, accurate information. In 2009 Wikipedia had over 130 Billion page views, and it's grown significantly since then. For almost every big search term you type in, a Wikipedia article is on the first page, if not one of the first three results. They have an extremely high domain authority, as this site is more than well respected by Google. A study in 2007 revealed that their information was nearly as accurate as that of the Encyclopedia Britannica, proving that their goal for accurate information has been met.
    That's the stats to show you how Wikipedia is truly an online empire. But how can I use to this to my SEO advantage? First of all, Wikipedia does not give out link juice - all of their links are nofollow. Secondly, they do not want you to add any links that you associate with in any way, so you can't be obvious about it. Thirdly, your website can be added to a spam list if links to your website keep continually getting added to Wikipedia articles, so watch out for that. With all that in mind, it most definitely will be worth the trouble. Not only is it a trusted link in Google's eyes, it is also a great source of traffic. For example, one of my clients has a link in one of Wikipedia's articles that is in a very insignificant place on the page (below the content and all of the other references), yet that one link provides 50 visitors a week for a small niche website. The value isn't in question, it's how you can get your links on the page.
    The first thing on your mind should be adding content, not links. Links will be secondary to content in all cases when dealing with Wikipedia. You want to provide accurate, unbiased information for Wikipedia before linking. You also want to be inconspicuous - don't provide a link just to your website, try and provide a few other links to credible sources on the subject. Now, when you place a link when editing, don't place it in the article, as it will only last for no more than 5 minutes with Wikipedia editor hawks just waiting to swoop in. Your best bet is to keep it in the references.
    When you go through this process, remember that you have a lot less likely hood of your link sticking if your account is brand new. You want to build up credibility by editing multiple pages by making the information accurate and neutral. Get involved on the talk pages on different articles, including the ones you want to edit and insert a link to your site. Your goal is to be just another neutral author with a credible background.
    For those thinking of creating a brand new Wikipedia article, proceed with caution. While Wikipedia encourages new articles on big brands not yet written about, the brand or company you are from needs to have a history of being in the news and on the media. If you own a small niche website, its best you keep away from this idea. If your company is big enough and in the news enough, then you will have a chance at the article being accepted. Make sure someone not associated with the company writes at least the beginning of the article, because your undoubted number one goal when writing the article is to make it as neutral and unbiased as possible. Your safest bet is to find someone you are acquainted with that has no connection to your brand or company, and have him at least write the first half.
    When writing a brand new article, your obvious concern from an SEO stand point is to get links. In this case, it is OK to add a link to your website in the article, but make sure you give out all links that are needed. Make sure to link to any websites associated with your company or brand in the article, as this can only help you & your site.
    The last thing I'd say to anyone out there eager to get links from Wikipedia is to not try and do it all at once. If you are aiming at links on multiple pages, make sure you start out by editing a few niche related articles, and then move on to one of the articles you are targeting, and then repeat the process. You can also use web 2.0 sites to generate quality backlinks. Make sure you review the content you are adding, as this will most likely decide whether or not your link will be accepted. Yes, this is a tedious process, and I've just covered the most important aspects of this process, but the results are well worth it.

    HOW TO GET WIKIPEDIA BACKLINKS
    Now that we already know the value of Wikipedia backlinks, we will be discussing on the ways to achieve the links. I had a lot of backlinks for my football related blog from Wikipedia and I will discuss on how I got them.
    You will need to find some wiki that you can have your links on. They should be related to your content and your links should add value to the wiki, until and unless you want your links permanent in Wikipedia.


    So what do you do to get links from Wikipedia ?
    Before starting, you will need to create a profile and start contributing to Wikipedia. Although you can edit wiki as an unregistered user and Wikipedia tracks you from your IP address, however links added from valuable profiles are highly likely to get for a long time. So before adding links, I would suggest you to create your profile and contribute to the community. Contribution means to edit some other Wikipedia pages that needs to get updated. This way, you will get your Wikipedia profile more valuable.
    Second, search for the wiki where you can add your own links, you can always use Google for the process. For example, you can use this keyword to get wiki related to your niche.
    site:wikipedia.org "your keyword"
    search for this keyword and you will get wiki related to your blogs where you can add links.
    These means Wiki has something that needs reference, and here you get the advantage. Wikipedia itself has been asking for the links. So if your link can prove the information, then your links are more likely to get approved. You can now link your website to a Wikipedia for your existing blog post that adds value, or you can create a new content to get your links approved.
    Beside, you can also search similarly with ‘dead links' instead of ‘citation needed'. Dead link refers to websites that were previously live but now does not exists. You can replace your links with the links those are dead.


    WRAPPING THINGS UP
    It is quite easy to get Wikipedia backlinks until you provide value to the pages. You can certainly enjoy great value from Wikipedia links and get referral traffic to your blog at the same time.
    Beside you can also use Wikipedia to find out broken or dead links, check the sites that have linked in to those dead links and ask the webmaster to replace the link with your content.
    Comment your thoughts below, and I will try to reply every one of them.

    IS WIKIPEDIA BACKLINK DO FOLLOW or NO FOLLOW?
    It will the strongest backlink for your site.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2016
  2. Nonilol

    Nonilol Elite Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,645
    Likes Received:
    559
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Media Informatics & Webdev Student
    Location:
    Hamburg, GER / Southampton, UK
    Home Page:
    Copy & paste from pointblankseo
    http://pointblankseo.com/wikipedia-seo-purposes
    The part that you wrote yourself doesn't include anything new. We have a bunch of much better guides on this topic here.

    "learnseo.pro" is your website, isn't it?
    Nice try promoting it.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2016
  3. SEO FOX

    SEO FOX Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2015
    Messages:
    3,533
    Likes Received:
    726
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Infront Of U!!
    Home Page:
    Lol.... You create a backlink to your site here.
     
  4. Mahalsingh

    Mahalsingh Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2014
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    72
    Occupation:
    Internet Marketing
    Location:
    India
    Its Jon Cooper Guys ;). J/K!

    OP! I checked the web 2.0 list. Great compilation though, hope all of them works :)
     
  5. Ambitious12

    Ambitious12 Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2014
    Messages:
    3,096
    Likes Received:
    609
    Occupation:
    No Occupation
    Location:
    Among the Stars
    Lol
    You think we are fool here:p
     
  6. whiteblackseo

    whiteblackseo Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2015
    Messages:
    2,493
    Likes Received:
    929
    Home Page:
    We're not stupids u know..?
     
  7. blackhatpc

    blackhatpc Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2014
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    109
    So blackhatworld has become Web 2.0 for some people .

    OP if this page stays alive then work on further tiers and don't forget to update us on your SEO for keyword " Web 2.0 sites )
     
  8. davids355

    davids355 Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    10,190
    Likes Received:
    7,840
    Home Page:
    Title doesn't make sense either, sounded more like you were asking the question.