How to evaluate if my blog content in manually written or not

Sometimes people cheat with automated content from software. How to avoid that ?

for someone whose native language is not English it's hard to figure it out, especially if the content is high quality.... although, I do have a couple of tips to help you figure this out.

tip 1: all sentences are short. The AI can't write long sentences that still make sense... not yet anyway. So, if the content you receive comes in short (10-15 words I'd say, but that's not a rule) sentences it's almost guaranteed to be written by the AI. Take my reply, for example. As you can see, my reply mixes short and long sentences, I also added ellipsis, brackets, and other punctuation that was necessary for me to convey the right idea and feeling. The AI can't do this yet, it just creates short sentences that make sense but are devoid of any sign of intelligence or sentiment. This is one way to know that your content is being written by a bot

tip 2: when a human writes your content they don't need to capitalize words in the middle of the sentence, or split words randomly, or insert references to various names / sites / resources... unless you specify this to your content writer, obviously. Most of the time, the AI capitalizes words (usually, the keywords) in the middle of a sentence, and a human would not do this because.... well, because he's a human and knows that capitalizing common words in the middle of a sentence is retarded. The AI doesn't know this because it's a stupid machine, and if you see common words being capitalized (even if it's only once per article) it's a good enough indication that the content is produced by the AI. And occasionally you will see calls to action or random names of websites or people added to a sentence. Again, sometimes these names / sites might be important depending on the topic of your article, but for most articles there's no need to reference anyone, and if you see this happening then the content is 100% created by the AI

It's easy, I mean at least for me and in my opinion.

Let's take an example: "Online marketing is the practice of leveraging web-based channels to spread a message about a company's brand, products, or services to its potential customers. The methods and techniques used for online marketing include email, social media, display advertising, search engine optimization, Google AdWords, and more."

Automated = "Internet advertising is the act of utilizing electronic channels to spread a message about an organization's image, items, or administrations to its expected clients. The strategies and procedures utilized for internet showcasing incorporate email, online media, show promoting, site improvement, Google AdWords and that's just the beginning."

The human brain can still write better text quality, AI is getting better and better and it's only a matter of time...

Anyway, for now, it can still be recognized.

MrDenz said:

internet showcasing

Click to expand...

I thought hey this isn't too bad till I got to this phrase! So common sense is still to be added to GPT-3 ...

It is easy to find based on the contents written in your blog.. AI do only the kind of short sentences.. if it's written in the big sentences and there may be punctuation in between the words like : you can sure this is written in manual.

This is best that you do write manual article for your site. auto, spin content or any software content is not good for your site.
This is totally risky. your ranking chances is very low.

Take a random read , you will get a feeling that it has been manually done or by a software.

It depends on the niche.

Some niches use formats that are basically robotic, predictable, and format-driven.

The only way you can tell really if it's original content is to determine if it's readable.

Also, look for idiomatic expressions or sayings that native English speakers normally use.

But for more free-form content, automated content sticks out like a sore thumb.

Why?

Generally speaking, artificial intelligence or machine-learning-based content generation tools can't tell stories. Start there.

They don't have insights. They don't get triggered by memories or free-form associations that involve some sort of emotional narrative.

And you might be thinking: "Well, this stuff doesn't really count. How does this matter?" It does a lot, especially if you want to sell stuff online.

You have to understand that for people to buy anything from you, whether it's a product or a service, they must first trust you.

You can take that to the bank.

Without trust sales are impossible. It's not just gonna happen.

And how do we get from stories to trust? Again, it's all about human psychology.

Because every single second, we pick up all sorts of stimuli from the outside world. We take in these neutral stimuli based on what we see, hear, touch, taste, and smell.

But there's got to be a way for us to organize all this information that seems to hit us from many different directions at once.

And oftentimes, we've taken all these stimuli at a rate of a thousand miles per hour. This is where stories come in.

You're able to relate things that you take in on a day-to-day and week-to-week and month-to-month basis to paint a story.

And this story shockingly enough resonates with many people because, despite our differences in appearances, personalities, world views, politics, or whathaveyou, we have a lot more in common than differences.

So when you put all these together and you speak "the same language" through your website's stories, people can trust you more.

Sadly, AI content has a long way to go when it comes to story-driven as well as persona-driven content. I'm not saying it's not gonna get there, but it's definitely going to be an uphill climb.

Just look if he put any links in the content or under his name, if that link looks spammy then he most likely used a software to do it.
I've always choose to approve comments manual.