[Guide]: How to write high quality articles in as little as two hours

Eternalman

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2021
Messages
187
Reaction score
104
Website
www.blackhatworld.com
After reading through a number of threads and posts on this forum on whether will AI content rank or not, and how good or bad it is. I have decided to write a guide or a post that resembles a guide.

In this guide, I'm going to talk about how you can write original and authentic content yourself without the help of an AI and still do it in a much faster and more effective way.

In fact, this is one of the methods I've been using for the last year to write content for my clients and for my website myself.

Before we get started I'd like to you know that this requires a bit of focus, and dedication to really get this thing done.

Now I need to also be honest with you and tell you that this is not a secret or a way that no one has been talking about. In fact, this is one of the things that I've learned online as well.

But it is something that many people have not gotten used to using or practicing, I guess, mainly due to their laziness.

If you're wondering about that could be well it's voice typing.

Before we get started I'll also like to mention that I've used a handful of AI tools and I haven't been satisfied with either one of them. I haven't been satisfied only because of the kind of articles that I need which are high-quality original articles that cover the topic in depth.

Now I have clients who run websites with AI content and they're doing very well but I also have the other type of clients who are doing so well if not better with voice-generated articles. In fact, they are doing incredibly well and ranking with almost three to four times fewer published articles than those who are churning out AI content.

Let us as an example take a topic and discuss what AI could generate and why would be bad, then we can talk about what you could generate and/or perhaps, why it would be better.

For the sake of argument, I decided to take a topic that I am a bit familiar with which is painting niche, particularly “how to get tempera paint out of clothes”.

If you were to generate or give this very topic to any AI tool, what it generates would be something like

  • Soak the clothes in the water so that it'll be easier to remove,
  • Next, apply a solution of your choice or paint remover to the area and sit it for 10 to 15 minutes,
  • After that, once the treatment had the chance to work wash your garment to make sure that the paint is gone.
(this in fact is a lighted edited result of a generated response, there was the most cliche, banal, and irritable intro like, there are many ways to get the paint off your clothes. )

Now if you really think about it this is a very general advice

This could be applied to get paint out of many types of clothing. right?

Although I'm not a painter and perhaps as knowledgeable as a real painter. I would know that getting the paint out of clothing isn't as easy as letting it sit for a few minutes applying a solution and washing it away.

Many nuances or situations depend on the type of clothing you're dealing with, its thickness, the seriousness of the spillage, etc. Now, these nuances are going to be hard to get the AI to explain.

You would need to tune in and fix and edit here and there to really get a higher-quality article.

However, if you don’t mind googling it and perhaps taking some notes, and don’t mind just ranting about your notes while holding a mic with the Google docs open.

You would have the first draft with the original and authentic article within 15-30 minutes that's likely going to rank longer and better than AI-generated one, with all the nuances covered. You may need to format it a bit as well, but that will take 10 times less time than with the AI-generated article.

Keep in mind, you would need to take notes, or make a content-outline outline. It is an important part. Because otherwise, you may have difficulty knowing what to talk about.

You don’t even have to be that knowledgeable about the niche. Though, a fundamental understanding of the topic and prior research is necessary.

In fact, the more you know about the topic, the better, but with a bit of focus, and common sense, you may just end up writing the most valuable content in your given niche.

But a thorough research is a must!

But it is not always the case that you are the subject matter expert, and may not know that much to rant about for an hour. In those situations, watch a video or two on youtube, and a few more articles online while taking notes.

Then you will be ready to speak your knowledge into existence with words, literally.

Depending on your level of understanding and knowledge it wouldn’t take more than 2 hours to write high-quality original content. But if it takes longer in the beginning, don’t worry, keep practicing it. It becomes easier the more you write.

I personally give 2 hours to each article, but that is considering that I watch a video or two and do my research for the first hour, take notes, and prepare my outline, which usually is picking headlines and that is it! My articles are usually between 1800-2200 words.

So, here it is, how to write high-quality content in as little as 2 hours!
 
2 hours a lot of time IMHO, but depends, I am writing ai articles in 15 minutes that rank. If you use a recipe thats all it will take.
 
2 hours a lot of time IMHO, but depends, I am writing ai articles in 15 minutes that rank. If you use a recipe thats all it will take.
2 hours to get high-quality content that not only ranks but covers the topic in much more depth than any AI tool could ever do! Plus, many ai tools just spin the paragraph, over and over again, and many fail to pass the plagiarism detection ( i check with huggingface). you will need to fix and edit that if you really want to avoid being noticed by the algorithm.

It is likely your competitors are also using one or the other ai tools. So, you are all talking about it on the same level without any further value to the reader.

So, for me, it is important to not just write for the Google but for the reader too, right? so, 2 hours is pretty fast when you could get such high-quality.
 
Does ppl still invest 2 hours to write articles when we have this OPENAI? anyways, it's a great guide - I saved it and probably send it to some of my writers.
 
May I know which AI tools you are using?
I have used Jasper, then I stopped, but went to Rytr, bought a lifetime deal from appsomu when they were new, but not using it. then tried peppertype. and with these three, I realized they were all almost useless if you want to produce a high quality content that covers the topic in greater depth.

I am not against, them, I still use surfer to generate outlines and edit it a bit myself, but when I was using those tools, I was still sending about 2 hours to get the articles where I want them to be. because they require a lot of editing and checking if you really want a high-quality content. otherwise, yes, they are fast.
 
I have used Jasper, then I stopped, but went to Rytr, bought a lifetime deal from appsomu when they were new, but not using it. then tried peppertype. and with these three, I realized they were all almost useless if you want to produce a high quality content that covers the topic in greater depth.

I am not against, them, I still use surfer to generate outlines and edit it a bit myself, but when I was using those tools, I was still sending about 2 hours to get the articles where I want them to be. because they require a lot of editing and checking if you really want a high-quality content. otherwise, yes, they are fast.
Which tool you recommend most out of the 3 that you mentioned? I considering to purchase jasper
 
I have used Jasper, then I stopped, but went to Rytr, bought a lifetime deal from appsomu when they were new, but not using it. then tried peppertype. and with these three, I realized they were all almost useless if you want to produce a high quality content that covers the topic in greater depth.

I am not against, them, I still use surfer to generate outlines and edit it a bit myself, but when I was using those tools, I was still sending about 2 hours to get the articles where I want them to be. because they require a lot of editing and checking if you really want a high-quality content. otherwise, yes, they are fast.

This is the thing people overlook, the amount of time for editing and fact checking.

3 years back I asked Jarvis or whatever it was called back then, to do me an article on a jigsaw puzzle gave the product name, SKU etc.
It generated the article and listed the number of pieces at 1400 when in fact the product was a 2k piece jigsaw.

I have used it to do similar articles and the factual information is often wrong and usually miles wrong. Distance by road from X to Y and everywhere else says it is 150 miles, but the Ai tool says it is 60 miles. Now had it said 160, that is an acceptable variation, but to be over double the distance wrong, is not good enough.
 
Which tool you recommend most out of the 3 that you mentioned? I considering to purchase jasper
Like I mentioned, I am against them. It is still possible to make a good use for them. For example, if you happen to be a niche that could potentially get traffic or at least benefit from answering on Quora. Jasper would've been perfect. You just give it the question and go through the answer, make sure it is correct, or correct enough, and paste it as an answer, the whole process perhaps would take no longer than a minute and you have just answered a question. do this for another 100 more, you might just start to see people follow you and listen to you, etc etc. but to straight build up a whole new article, it requires lots of editing, and fact-checking and like, simply put taking it by the hand and guiding it in every step.

So, why guide an AI to essentially get a paraphrased version of what your competitors are saying, when you could spend the same amount of time, perhaps just a little longer but to get an article that is better with more depth, less water, and importantly worth reading, sharing, and talking about,.
 
It is not the amount of time that matters, but the quality and attractiveness of the content that matters.
YES, agree, and this guide was meant for people who want to get the best of both worlds, writing high-quality content that attracts the attention of the algorithm and the reader while being written fast. (well, fast by my standard, perhaps there are other more experienced people, who are doing what I do maybe even faster)
 
There are many AI tools that are good for example rytrme
 
Like I mentioned, I am against them. It is still possible to make a good use for them. For example, if you happen to be a niche that could potentially get traffic or at least benefit from answering on Quora. Jasper would've been perfect. You just give it the question and go through the answer, make sure it is correct, or correct enough, and paste it as an answer, the whole process perhaps would take no longer than a minute and you have just answered a question. do this for another 100 more, you might just start to see people follow you and listen to you, etc etc. but to straight build up a whole new article, it requires lots of editing, and fact-checking and like, simply put taking it by the hand and guiding it in every step.

So, why guide an AI to essentially get a paraphrased version of what your competitors are saying, when you could spend the same amount of time, perhaps just a little longer but to get an article that is better with more depth, less water, and importantly worth reading, sharing, and talking about,.

If I was a professional writer then I would be against them too. because it gives unfair advantage to those who don't know anything about writing a proper article probably like u do
 
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features and essential functions on BlackHatWorld and other forums. These functions are unrelated to ads, such as internal links and images. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock