1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Google’s conduct has resulted—and will result—in real harm to consumers and to innovation

Discussion in 'White Hat SEO' started by bartosimpsonio, Mar 20, 2015.

  1. bartosimpsonio

    bartosimpsonio Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    12,774
    Likes Received:
    11,427
    Occupation:
    COINZ
    Location:
    BUYAH
    Home Page:
    (If you search for the article title on ....Google..... you can click on it and not get paywalled.)

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-the-u-s-antitrust-probe-of-google-1426793274

    Inside the U.S. Antitrust Probe of Google


    Key FTC staff wanted to sue Internet giant after finding ?real harm to consumers and to innovation?


    WASHINGTON?Officials at the Federal Trade Commission concluded in 2012 that Google Inc. used anticompetitive tactics and abused its monopoly power in ways that harmed Internet users and rivals, a far harsher analysis of Google?s business than was previously known.
    The staff report from the agency?s bureau of competition recommended the commission bring a lawsuit challenging three Google practices. The move would have triggered one of the highest-profile antitrust cases since the Justice Department sued Microsoft Corp. in the 1990s.


    The 160-page critique, which was supposed to remain private but was inadvertently disclosed in an open-records request, concluded that Google?s ?conduct has resulted?and will result?in real harm to consumers and to innovation in the online search and advertising markets.?
    The findings stand in contrast to the conclusion of the FTC?s commissioners, who voted unanimously in early 2013 to end the investigation after Google agreed to some voluntary changes to its practices.
    It is unusual for the commissioners to not take staff recommendations. But in this case, they were wrestling with competing recommendations, including a separate report from the agency?s economic bureau that didn?t favor legal action.


    Then-Chairman Jon Leibowitz said in a written statement at the time that Google?s voluntary changes deliver ?more relief for American consumers faster than any other option.?
    Google General Counsel Kent Walker said in a statement Thursday that the FTC ultimately ?agreed that there was no need to take action on how we rank and display search results.? He added: ?Speculation about potential consumer harm turned out to be entirely wrong. Since the investigation closed two years ago, the ways people access information online have only increased, giving consumers more choice than ever before.?
    On one issue?whether Google used anticompetitive tactics for its search engine?the competition staff recommended against a lawsuit, although it said Google?s actions resulted in ?significant harm? to rivals. In three other areas, the report found evidence the company used its monopoly behavior to help its own business and hurt its rivals.


    The report undercuts Google?s oft-stated contention that the FTC found no evidence of wrongdoing. ?The conclusion is clear: Google?s services are good for users and good for competition,? said David Drummond, Google?s senior vice president and chief legal officer, when the FTC closed the matter.
    It could prompt new complaints from some Google competitors, such as Yelp Inc., who allege the company still engages in anticompetitive behavior, and renewed focus by antitrust authorities in Europe, who are pursuing their own look into Google.
    ?This document appears to show that the FTC had direct evidence from Google of intentional search bias,? said Luther Lowe, the vice president of public policy for Yelp.


    The Wall Street Journal viewed portions of the document after the agency inadvertently disclosed it as part of a Freedom of Information Act request. The FTC declined to release the undisclosed pages and asked the Journal to return the document, which it declined to do.
    ?Unfortunately, an unredacted version of this material was inadvertently released in response to a FOIA request,? an FTC spokesman said in a statement to the Journal. ?We are taking steps to ensure this does not happen again.?


    Embedded in the document and in detailed footnotes are an array of previously unknown details about Google?s business, many of which come from senior officials such as Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt, former executive Marissa Mayer and co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin.
    Data included in the report suggest Google was more dominant in the U.S. Internet search market than was widely believed. The company estimated its market share at between 69% and 84% during a period when research firm comScore put it at 65%. ?From an antitrust perspective, I?m happy to see [comScore] underestimate our share,? the report quoted Google Chief Economist Hal Varian as saying, without specifying the context.
    An antitrust suit against Google would have pitted Obama administration appointees against one of the White House?s closest corporate allies. Google was the second-largest corporate source of campaign donations to President Barack Obama?s re-election effort. Google executives have visited the White House scores of times since Mr. Obama has been in office, according to visitor logs.


    ?The FTC is an independent agency and we respect their independent decision-making,? said Jennifer Friedman, a White House spokeswoman.
    In its investigation, FTC staff said Google?s conduct ?helped it to maintain, preserve and enhance Google?s monopoly position in the markets for search and search advertising? in violation of the law. Google?s behavior ?will have lasting negative effects on consumer welfare,? the report said.
    Google has long disputed any characterization that it is a monopoly, saying that competition is ?just a click away.?
    In discussing one of the issues the FTC staff wanted to sue over, the report said the company illegally took content from rival websites such as Yelp, TripAdvisor Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. to improve its own websites. It cited one instance when Google copied Amazon?s sales rankings to rank its own items. It also copied Amazon?s reviews and ratings, the report found. Spokesmen for TripAdvisor and Amazon declined to comment.


    When competitors asked Google to stop taking their content, it threatened to remove them from its search engine.
    ?It is clear that Google?s threat was intended to produce, and did produce, the desired effect,? the report said, ?which was to coerce Yelp and TripAdvisor into backing down.? The company also sent a message that it would ?use its monopoly power over search to extract the fruits of its rivals? innovations.?
    In its final agreement, the commission secured a promise that Google would allow websites to opt out of having their content included in its competing search products.
    The staff said Google also broke antitrust law by placing restrictions on websites that publish its search results from also working with rivals such as Microsoft?s Bing and Yahoo Inc.


    The commission made no mention of this issue in its final report, nor did it secure any commitments from Google to change its policies.
    In a third area, the FTC staff said Google violated antitrust law by restricting advertisers? ability to use data garnered from Google ad campaigns in advertising run on rival platforms.
    The FTC report cited a Google employee who said the company once wanted to do away with the unnecessary restriction but was overruled by Mr. Page, who is now Google?s chief executive. A Google spokeswoman declined to make Mr. Page available for comment.
    Ultimately, Google changed this policy voluntarily in 2013 at the behest of the agency.
    On the most important issue, that of Google?s prized search engine, the FTC report said Google altered it to benefit its own services at the expense of rivals. The report said Google ?adopted a strategy of demoting, or refusing to display, links to certain vertical websites in highly commercial categories.?

    In what it termed ?a close call,? the staff said the FTC shouldn?t issue a complaint against the company because of legal hurdles and Google?s ?strong procompetitive justifications.?


    The ?evidence paints a complex portrait of a company working toward an overall goal of maintaining its market share by providing the best user experience, while simultaneously engaging in tactics that resulted in harm to many vertical competitors, and likely helped to entrench Google?s monopoly power over search and search advertising,? the staff said.
    On Jan. 3, the five FTC commissioners voted to close the investigation. A few months later, now FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez told a Senate committee that a majority of commissioners didn?t support a case against Google on any of the allegations under investigation.
    Write to Brody Mullins at [email protected], Rolfe Winkler at [email protected] and Brent Kendall at [email protected]
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  2. Enryu

    Enryu Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2013
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    158
    Interesting read, especially the above quote as I hadn't realized a resolution had been reached. Surprising Google got away with that for so long.

    As an aside, Barto you seem to be the most anti-Google person on this site. What's your history with them? Did Google have a former blackhat partner of yours assassinated?
     
  3. blackouts

    blackouts Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2011
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    246
    Location:
    BRAZIL!
    In other words, G00gle can steal content and get away with it ...
    If we use others sites content they call it "duplicate content" and get a penalty ... hypocrites!
     
  4. Zwielicht

    Zwielicht Moderator Staff Member Moderator Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    7,732
    Likes Received:
    13,899
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Death
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Home Page:
    Bartosimpsonio's story is one of secrecy, love, and revenge.

    Bartosimpsonio is not only a survivor of The Great Black Hat War, but he was a Polkovnik (that's Russian for Colonel) for the Black Hat Federation. During the war, Bartosimpsonio worked as a double agent until he inevitably turned against the corporate giant Google for their duplicity by throwing hundreds of their white hats out of windows. As a result, shoot-outs with the FBI ensued and Bartosimpsonio's hot blonde girlfriend was caught in the crossfire, killing her almost instantly. Since then, Bartosimpsonio has been waiting for the right moment to avenge her death, with some saying that the day of reckoning is upon us all.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 4
  5. bartosimpsonio

    bartosimpsonio Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    12,774
    Likes Received:
    11,427
    Occupation:
    COINZ
    Location:
    BUYAH
    Home Page:


    Looks like we have a naturally gifted writer here ;)