Google LOVES Complete Trash Content!!!

leaffulfilled

Newbie
Joined
Jun 10, 2021
Messages
47
Reaction score
9
True, also YouTube has become such a garbage fire it is time to dump it for good
 

MKSKS

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
2,572
Reaction score
1,076
Not sure why your AI contents got deindexed mine are all good on all websites and web 2.0's.
Regarding trash content here is a thing it used to work in past and it still works today.
I still use multiblogger to create autoblogs and it still works.
 

blackbeans

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
5,340
Reaction score
2,371
Website
www.ozki.org
That’s a fascinating case study that you put up.


I think a lot of this has to do with Google machine learning and how Google can detect patterns based on what people do and make projections and predictions from there.


At the end of the day, “readable” may not be the standard that Google is looking for. It’s looking for other indicators of user experience.
 

deepdigger

Power Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2017
Messages
685
Reaction score
297
nothing to be happy here , sooner you gonna see a big downshift with a thin content penalty
 

ANewBeginning

Power Member
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
733
Reaction score
464
That’s a fascinating case study that you put up.


I think a lot of this has to do with Google machine learning and how Google can detect patterns based on what people do and make projections and predictions from there.


At the end of the day, “readable” may not be the standard that Google is looking for. It’s looking for other indicators of user experience.
I think it was due to conversion.ai barely spinning content and producing highly duplicate content. I didn't find out until after publishing 100+ articles on the site and checking the deindexed ones.
 

kaudo

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
565
Reaction score
808
Website
www.smartial.net
Not sure why your AI contents got deindexed mine are all good on all websites and web 2.0's.
Regarding trash content here is a thing it used to work in past and it still works today.
I still use multiblogger to create autoblogs and it still works.
Me too.
I still have some news-like autoblogs. I scrape US newspapers for fresh news based on keywords and repost. I use them to quickly index my backlinks, I auto-infiltrate them in content. It's 100% copy-paste yet they get 20-100 visits daily from google. The articles rank for names, places, events and such keywords.
 

ANewBeginning

Power Member
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
733
Reaction score
464
Me too.
I still have some news-like autoblogs. I scrape US newspapers for fresh news based on keywords and repost. I use them to quickly index my backlinks, I auto-infiltrate them in content. It's 100% copy-paste yet they get 20-100 visits daily from google. The articles rank for names, places, events and such keywords.
I want to try that approach in the future. Do a 100% 1:1 copy of a site on another domain and see what happens. Ideally, the new domain would have more authority than the copied one lol
 

karupoiss

Elite Member
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
929
Yeah, google deindexes spam content in 8-10 months. So i can always 301 redirect the old contet to the new domain and keep ranking :p



yeah, but idk why it gets deindexed



right, but its easier to spam google than social media



scrape, spin, post; in volume



for the 700 articles, i scraped, spun and posted the articles. i didnt use the posted articles as source

You say the sites lasts for 8-10 months but how fast do they rank?

Also, when spinning the articles - do you use phrase spinning also or just word synonyms?
 

ANewBeginning

Power Member
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
733
Reaction score
464
You say the sites lasts for 8-10 months but how fast do they rank?

Also, when spinning the articles - do you use phrase spinning also or just word synonyms?
I dont know if they rank, I only know I get 4-5 visitors a month from each spam site, so making more domains is the way to go here ;)

With SPAM, VOLUME is king!

All kinds of spinning.
 

itz_styx

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
1,610
Website
argo-content.com
I dont know if they rank, I only know I get 4-5 visitors a month from each spam site, so making more domains is the way to go here ;)

With SPAM, VOLUME is king!

All kinds of spinning.
then you should promote them better. even only 4-5 a day would be very low numbers. you can get much more even with pure markov content ;)
 

karupoiss

Elite Member
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
929
I dont know if they rank, I only know I get 4-5 visitors a month from each spam site, so making more domains is the way to go here ;)

With SPAM, VOLUME is king!

All kinds of spinning.

then you should promote them better. even only 4-5 a day would be very low numbers. you can get much more even with pure markov content ;)

Question for both of you: which would be better - copying paragraphs from different sites, making them all into one big paragraph, then randomizing the order of sentences and then cutting them up into different paragraphs OR doing the same thing but also spinning on word level? The first one imo would keep the sentences readable and the long tails also - the second one would make the text more unique but the long tails might go missing as it uses weird synonyms at times.
 

itz_styx

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
1,610
Website
argo-content.com

karupoiss

Elite Member
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
929
depends how you do it. the first would be better readable, but if you for example cloak, then the other option you proposed would also work well.
The end user would never see the text, it's only for G.

The question is rather as in would the second version rank worse than the first version due to not containing the exact long tails (I would copy the sentences used from first page results for the keyword).
 

itz_styx

Jr. VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
1,610
Website
argo-content.com
The end user would never see the text, it's only for G.

The question is rather as in would the second version rank worse than the first version due to not containing the exact long tails (I would copy the sentences used from first page results for the keyword).
well its better to include the longtails if you want to rank for them as well.
 

ANewBeginning

Power Member
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
733
Reaction score
464
then you should promote them better. even only 4-5 a day would be very low numbers. you can get much more even with pure markov content ;)
i dont care about promoting them as i know bulk domains work as well haha. maybe ill try interlinking all of the domains as a test and see if that works xd

i do use argo as well man hehe! im in your skype group bro!! xd i do spin + markov ;)
Question for both of you: which would be better - copying paragraphs from different sites, making them all into one big paragraph, then randomizing the order of sentences and then cutting them up into different paragraphs OR doing the same thing but also spinning on word level? The first one imo would keep the sentences readable and the long tails also - the second one would make the text more unique but the long tails might go missing as it uses weird synonyms at times.
just spin at word level + do markov.
 

karupoiss

Elite Member
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
929
Do u use the keyword in title + in text as in h1 or smth and then use the markov spun content?

My question is - if u use the same type of seed article in your niche for either markov or just spinning it - wouldn't the generated pages compete with each other even if the titles are different kws as the rest of the article is thematically the same (even if the sentences are different, the topic remains the same for each page).
 

ANewBeginning

Power Member
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
733
Reaction score
464
Do u use the keyword in title + in text as in h1 or smth and then use the markov spun content?

My question is - if u use the same type of seed article in your niche for either markov or just spinning it - wouldn't the generated pages compete with each other even if the titles are different kws as the rest of the article is thematically the same (even if the sentences are different, the topic remains the same for each page).
i just spin content. i try tons of things so i dont 1 same thing on all sites. different domains can rank for one same kw :p

The scary thought is, what happens when the Google AI bot learns to write the articles themselves?
we are light-years away from that
 
Top